Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

The charade of autonomy in Pok’s political setup

- DP Srivastava

Any change in government in Islamabad is usually followed by a shuffle in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir’s (Pok)’s political set-up. This reflects the absence of autonomy in the territory, which Pakistan otherwise claims to be azad or independen­t. This drama was re-enacted in April after Prime Minister (PM) Imran Khan lost power in Pakistan.

The last election in POK in July 2021 brought to power a Pakistan Tehreek-e-insaf party (PTI) government headed by Abdul Qayyum Khan Niazi. PTI, which is headed by Imran Khan, replaced the previous government of Pakistan Muslim League-nawaz (PML-N) headed by Raja Farouk Haider. Days after Imran Khan’s ouster, Sardar Tanveer Ilyas took over as PM of POK, replacing Niazi. However, there was a curious twist. The no-confidence motion against Niazi was brought by his own party members.

The drama in POK began soon after Shehbaz Sharif was elected as Pakistan’s PM on April 11. Three days later, Niazi sacked five cabinet ministers. This triggered the no-confidence motion, and Ilyas, also from PTI, took over. Was this an intra-party change brought about with the approval of the party leader, Imran Khan?

A vote on the floor of the legislatur­e is an unusual route to do so. A party leader, who had just lost power at the federal level, is unlikely to initiate such a no-confidence motion, which could result in the loss of his regional fiefdom.

If Khan did not initiate the move, where did the impulse for change come from? The election or selection of PM of POK is not possible without a nod from the army. But the army was avoiding a change in the sensitive area, which could damage the narrative that the problem lies on the Indian side of the Line of Control (LOC). Any change of the figurehead without changing the party equation is the least cost option. Ilyas got 33 votes in the 53-member assembly session, boycotted by the 19 opposition members from Pakistan People’s Party and PML-N.

Changing a government via a vote in the assembly seems legitimate in a democracy, but POK has a different arrangemen­t. Under the original Interim Constituti­on Act of 1974, all the important legislativ­e and executive powers were vested in a council headed by Pakistan’s PM. This was criticised as rule by proxy by Islamabad.

Under the 13th amendment of the “interim” constituti­on in 2018, the council was relegated to an advisory role. Instead of transferri­ng its powers to the elected assembly, Pakistan assumed direct legislativ­e authority on 32 subjects. The elected assembly needs Pakistan’s approval for legislatin­g even on the remaining 22 subjects.

It is interestin­g that the 13th amendment of Pok’s “interim” constituti­on was made a year before the revocation of Article 370 by the Government of India. While Pakistan has always exercised absolute powers over and within POK, the 13th amendment made a subtle, yet far-reaching change. Earlier, Islamabad enjoyed powers behind a charade of autonomy for the territory. Now, it has assumed those powers directly within the territory.

POK is effectivel­y integrated in Pakistan, not only in terms of the constituti­onal compact of powers, but through political control. It is Pakistan’s mainstream parties that have formed government­s in POK in successive “elections”. The hold of regional or “Kashmiri” political parties has progressiv­ely diminished. The Muslim Conference, which had supported the demand for POK to join Pakistan

in 1947, has only one member in the 53-seat legislatur­e. The Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front, which supports the “independen­ce” option, is not even allowed to participat­e in elections. Azadi (freedom) has no place in azad (free) Kashmir, and is only encouraged on the Indian side of the LOC.

The POK drama may soon be followed in Gilgit-baltistan. The efforts to unseat the sitting chief minister Khalid Khurshid, a PTI member, began in April. Recently, the CM insisted that his convoy was targeted by the Punjab Police, while they were proceeding to attend a rally in Islamabad. He survived, but his political survival is uncertain.

DP Srivastava is former ambassador and author of the book, Forgotten Kashmir: The Other Side of the Line of Control The views expressed are personal

 ?? EPA ?? POK is effectivel­y integrated into Pakistan, not only in terms of the constituti­onal compact of powers, but through political control. It is Pakistan’s mainstream parties that have formed government­s in POK in successive “elections”
EPA POK is effectivel­y integrated into Pakistan, not only in terms of the constituti­onal compact of powers, but through political control. It is Pakistan’s mainstream parties that have formed government­s in POK in successive “elections”
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India