Hindustan Times (Noida)

BLOCKADE CALL NOT SEDITION, SAYS SHARJEEL IMAM’S LAWYER

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student Sharjeel Imam, arrested for making alleged inflammato­ry speeches during protests against the Citizenshi­p (Amendment) Act, or CAA, told a Delhi court on Monday that he cannot be booked for sedition because none of his statements directly or indirectly called for violence.

Imam, while seeking bail in a case related to speeches he made at two universiti­es in 2019 where he allegedly threatened to “cut off” Assam and the rest of the Northeast from India, through his counsel Tanveer Ahmed Mir contended that the right to protest, the right to blockade, and the right to bring the country to a standstill is not equal to an act of sedition.

“The speech did not call for violence. He just called for a road blockade. He did not say that the northeast should become a different state and declare independen­ce. That would have been seditious,” Mir told additional sessions judge Amitabh Rawat.

He added, “What society will be a society if it’s not robust or what doesn’t react. It will be a heap of sheep.”

“When Sharjeel Imam says that this piece of legislatio­n is unconstitu­tional, and seeks to persuade the government to rethink and says if you don’t do it, we will be on the streets, he cannot be hammered by sedition,” Mir contended.

The speeches in question were made at Jamia Millia Islamia in Delhi on December 13, 2019, and at the Aligarh Muslim University on December 16, 2019. Imam has been in judicial custody since January 28, 2020.

In its charge sheet against Imam, the Delhi police have alleged that Imam gave speeches inciting hatred, contempt, and disaffecti­on towards the central government and instigated the people, which led to the violence outside Jamia Millia Islamia in December 2019.

Mir argued that he was ‘astounded’ to see the investigat­ing officer calling his client bigoted just because he seems to criticise the Constituti­on of India.

“The petitioner at no point of time has said that you should resort to violence,” he asserted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India