Hindustan Times (Noida)

Need SC approval for 10% EWS quota, Madras HC rules

- Divya Chandrabab­u letters@hindustant­imes.com

CHENNAI: The concept of reservatio­n as envisioned by the Constituti­on was turned on its head by repeated extensions, the Madras high court said on Tuesday as it ruled that quotas for the economical­ly backward classes in medical colleges needed approval from the Supreme Court.

A bench of chief justice Sanjib Banerjee and justice PD Audikesava­lu approved a July notificati­on by the Centre to provide 27% reservatio­n to Other Backward Class (OBC) candidates in medical colleges under the all-india quota (AIQ), and closed a contempt petition by Tamil Nadu’s ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) on the matter.

But it raised a question on implementa­tion of 10% EWS quota as it breached the 50% cap set by the Supreme Court in a landmark 1992 judgment.

The HC observed that the concept of reservatio­n, as envisioned by those framing the Constituti­on, had been “turned on its head” by repeated amendments and “the veritable reinvigora­tion of the caste system”.

“Rather than the caste system being wiped away, the present trend seems to perpetuate it by endlessly extending a measure that was to remain only for a short duration to cover the infancy and, possibly, the adolescenc­e of the Republic. Though the life of a nation state may not be relatable to the human process of aging, but at over-70, it ought, probably, to be more mature,” the bench added.

The DMK’S contempt petition contended that central government officials should be punished for not implementi­ng an order of the high court issued in July 2020 in favour of OBC reservatio­ns in medical seats.

“The notificati­on of July 29, 2021 issued by the Union as a consequenc­e of the order dated July 27, 2020, appears to be in order insofar as it provides for reservatio­n for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and OBC categories...” the bench said.

”The additional reservatio­n provided for economical­ly weaker sections in the notificati­on of July 29, 2021 cannot be permitted, except with the approval of the Supreme Court in such regard,” the bench added.

The bench’s objections appeared to stem from the fact that with the 10% quota for EWS, the total quantum of reservatio­n breaches the 50% cap set by the Supreme Court. In a verdict in May this year, the top court refused to relook at the 50% cap.

Challenges to the EWS reservatio­n -- instituted in 2019 ahead of the general elections -- are pending before the apex court.

In a response in Parliament in July, the government had said that the May verdict of the Supreme Court won’t affect EWS quotas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India