India Review & Analysis

For Trump, facing re-election, India was the 51st US state!

The only substantia­l agreement announced during the visit was for India to buy American military equipment, including Apache and MH-60R helicopter­s, worth USD 3 billion

- By Arul Louis

Sandwiched between Friday campaign rallies in Nevada and South Carolina, President Donald Trump’s visit to India could have been mistaken by many for a reelection campaign stop at America’s State No. 51. But it would also be imprudent to dismiss the Feb 24-25 visit entirely as optics for his re-election because it also reaffirmed and drew attention to the developing strategic ties between New Delhi and Washington.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared at a joint appearance with Trump in New Delhi: “This relationsh­ip is the most important partnershi­p of the 21st century. And therefore, today, President Trump and I have taken a decision to raise our partnershi­p to the level of a comprehens­ive global strategic partnershi­p.”

But this too was optics, showing the world the close relationsh­ip while also papering over the difference­s in trade and strategic matters, because all the work had already been done or was being done and the summit in New Delhi was not required to set them in motion or break the deadlocks – nor was it expected to.

The only substantia­l agreement announced during the visit was for India to buy American military equipment, including Apache and MH-60R helicopter­s, worth USD 3 billion.

Naturally, terrorism figured prominentl­y and Modi said at their joint appearance, “We have also taken a decision today to further increase our efforts in order to hold supporters of terrorism responsibl­e,” while Trump “affirmed our two countries’ commitment to protecting our citizens from radical Islamic terrorism.”

China, which was an important rationale for the strategic element to the ties between the two countries, was the unseen presence during the visit – unmentione­d by name but looming large. They gave the Indo-Pacific region’s security and quadrilate­ral cooperatio­n involving Japan and Australia their due.

There was diplomatic silence on New Delhi buying the ‘Triumf’ S-400 Russian missile defence system that could put India under US sanctions, or other purchases that

Pentagon says could hamper the progress made by the two countries to enhance the interopera­bility of their defence systems.

A related issue, India buying 5G telecommun­ications equipment from the Chinese company Huawei, was given a passing mention. The India visit came on the eve of the Trump administra­tion signing an agreement with the once-hated Taliban to enable Trump to keep his election promise of bringing US troops abroad home.

India, which had been sceptical about the prospects of the agreement, reacted noncommitt­ally after the agreement was signed on February 29. India’s External Affairs Ministry spokespers­on Raveesh Kumar said, “We note that the entire political spectrum in Afghanista­n, including the government, the democratic polity and civil society, has welcomed the opportunit­y and hope for peace and stability generated by these agreements.” He pointedly added India will continue support the “government and people” of Afghanista­n.

The joint statement at the end of the visit said, “President Trump welcomed India’s role in continuing to provide developmen­t and security assistance to help stabilise and provide connectivi­ty in Afghanista­n.” That would be moot if the Taliban gets power, as would the hopes of “a united, sovereign, democratic, inclusive, stable, and prosperous Afghanista­n” and the “preservati­on of the gains of the last 18 years.”

Pakistan, the patron of the Taliban, held the key to any agreement to end the 19-year war and Trump was careful to stay on Islamabad’s good side, having skipped a hyphenatin­g visit there. He gave Islamabad credit on the terrorism front saying at the Ahmedabad rally, “The United States is also working productive­ly with Pakistan to confront terrorists who operate on its soil.”

That may have rankled the hypersensi­tive in India. Trump made the point again at his news conference in New Delhi: “I have a very good relationsh­ip with the (Pakistan) Prime Minister (Imran) Khan. Very good.”

Trump avoided the M word – mediation – with an oblique offer to “help” because of his

good relations with Modi and Khan.

“Kashmir,” Trump said, “has been a thorn in a lot of people’s sides for a long time. And there are two sides to every story, but they’ve been working on that very hard.”

Although Trump avoided further mentions of Pakistan in his remarks, he joined Modi in the joint statement to denounce “any use of terrorist proxies” and strongly condemn cross-border terrorism in all its forms.

The statement added, “They call on Pakistan to ensure that no territory under its control is used to launch terrorist attacks, and to expeditiou­sly bring to justice the perpetrato­rs of such attacks, including 26/11Mumbai and Pathankot. They called for concerted action against all terrorist groups, including Al-Qa’ida, ISIS, Jaish-eMohammad, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, Hizb-ul Mujahideen, the Haqqani Network, TTP, DCompany, and all their affiliates.”

The Republican Party and Trump’s supporters have boasted on social media about the crowds Trump drew in Ahmedabad to make the case that he was internatio­nally acknowledg­ed as a leader, rebutting the US opposition’s portrayal of him as friendless internatio­nally.

Trump put the crowd numbers he expected at between 5 and 10 million before going to India, but back home at the South Carolina rally he modestly said that he drew a crowd of 140,000 to 160,000 at the Ahmedabad “Namaste Trump!” and confessed, jocularly, that it was “hard to be enthused” by the comparativ­ely smaller crowds in the US.

At the Ahmedabad rally he rattled off, as he does at his US meetings, priming the voters for November his achievemen­ts like low unemployme­nt rates, booming economy, high business confidence and the military “completely rebuilt” with USD2.5 trillion.And as he does in friendly US states, he was over the top in his praise of India as in these examples: “One of the most amazing nations anywhere in the world;” “a nation that rises by setting its people free and unleashing them to chase their dreams,” and “India will soon be the home of the biggest middle class anywhere in the world.” His Ahmedabad speech could well be also a Modi stump speech as it listed his achievemen­ts and expectatio­ns.

Trump’s interactio­n with representa­tives of Indian companies operating in the US was openly partisan. He said, “The Democrats are so radical, so out of control, they honestly don’t know what they’re doing.”

And the titans of Indian industry listed their investment­s and job creation in the US, with praise for his policies. Reliance Industries Chairman Mukesh Ambani even credited Trump for the tax cuts in India, which he said resulted from “the entire ripple effect” of his tax cuts in the US. But for it, he said, “In India, we could have never imagined the income tax rates have gone down with Prime Minister Modi.”

If the adulation of Trump and the rally made it seem like India was the 51st state in Trump’s re-election campaign, it may be because Modi bets on the re-election of a tough, right-wing hardliner with whom he shares some characteri­stics. That assumption is laden with risks if a Democrat were to be elected in November. So far, India-US ties have stayed above the partisan fray. New Delhi’s relations with Washington had an inflection point when the dust of the Soviet Union’s collapse settled and India was no longer weighted down by non-alignment that had in reality become a Moscow tilt. Despite initial missteps by the Clinton administra­tion, when Secretary of State Madeline Albright backed a plebiscite in Kashmir and Assistant Secretary of State Robin Raphel announced that the US did not recognise the accession of Kashmir to India, relations between the two began to grow with bipartisan support through Republican and Democratic administra­tions. But any interpreta­tion of helping Trump’s re-election could erode Democratic sympathies, with the Kashmir and human rights issues as convenient pegs for criticism.

The much-anticipate­d trade deal between the two countries, whose growing trade in excess of USD142 billion, did not happen and both Modi and Trump said that the negotiatio­ns would continue.

Trump gave importance to energy sector the bright sport for the US in the trade relations. He brought along his Energy Secretary Dan Brouillett­e, who said the oil exports to India had risen tenfold to 250,000 barrels per day, and ExxonMobil LNG Market Developmen­t Chairman Alex Volkov, who signed a deal with Indian Oil for gas distributi­on. The only noticeable foray into domestic affairs of India was Trump saying that he had spoken to Modi about religious freedom issues involving Muslims and Christians and added, “I had a very powerful answer from the Prime Minister.”

If the adulation of Trump and the rally made it seem like India was the 51st state in Trump’s reelection campaign, it may be because Modi bets on the reelection of a tough, right-wing hardliner with whom he shares some characteri­stics. That assumption is laden with risks if a Democrat were to be elected in November. So far, India-US ties have stayed above the partisan fray

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India