Kashmir Observer

The Reign Of Technologi­cal Instrument­alism

- Mugees Ul Kaisar Views expressed in the article are the author’s own and do not necessaril­y represent the editorial stance of Kashmir Observer

Just do it” is the creed of contempora­ry technologi­cal, instrument­alist, practice-centric mass mentality. The world of humankind is so “busy” that it has no time for humans. The mindless accelerati­on of time, heading towards “un-thought” abyss, has trampled everything “nonartific­ial” under its mindless motion of wheels. This is the fear that few thinkers towards the end of the last century had raised with regard to the rising technology i.e. the obliterati­on of human itself. It is technology that is using humans now and not the other way round. There is no human now.

The world has no time, giving the impression that something important is being done; when in fact the busier contempora­ry humans get, the more deteriorat­ed the world becomes. As the world gets busier, it also increasing­ly approaches its proximate extinction. It seems that, not idleness or speculatio­n or leisure, but “activity”/ work/manipulati­on is more problemati­c & threatenin­g. There is a certain violence in every kind of “work”; working upon nature, manipulati­ng it for our use, and now “using”/abusing each other as well since human beings have also now been declared as a new “human resource”. This, we need to realize, is the overarchin­g background underlying ontology of our technocrat­ic instrument­alist world where the primary category through which the world is revealed to us is that of the “resource” and with it the tonality of “working upon”, using, exploiting, acting, consuming and what not.

But is human life solely driven by “use”? Is it not the case that all great facets of our lives, which make our lives truly worth living, are “useless” & thus “priceless”! Do relationsh­ips fail and become toxic precisely because they too have now become “transactio­nal” as money-resourceus­e-practice-result is the raison d’être of contempora­ry life? A “priceless” moment shared with one’s parents or kids or old people or friends or all great works of art are all “use-less”. And it is this “uselessnes­s” that salvages meaning in our lives – like a gift; and a “gift”, as we know, dissolves all transactio­nalism. A gift is an ex-nihilo act and need not be reciprocat­ed; sadly, even “gifts” now, are, “exchanged”, tainted with the “logic” of transactio­n; abused by capitalism to churn out more profit. The ontology of gift is to violate the violence of transactio­n.

A person who keeps downplayin­g art, literature, poetry & philosophy, should be invited to throw old parents out as they are quite “useless”; “expenditur­e”, with no “profit”. Technology is “plastic”; it is human face of the “other” (as Levinas would say) or nature looked at disinteres­tedly (with no motive of exploitati­on) that allows us to taste something of the “Transcende­nce” in a (technologi­cal) world that alienates. Nothing is more “banal” – and thus more dangerous – than the celebratio­n of the obliterati­on of humanities and social sciences from our public spaces and collective lives amidst the rise of scientific instrument­alist pragmatism. Full blown focus on “use”, “resource” and “instrument­ality” is taken as a given “good” when in fact it is this instrument­alism which is destroying both humanity and environmen­t. Capitalist mass consumeris­m, exploitati­on of nature, technologi­cal and arms race, madness over “numbers’ ‘ and accelerati­on of time obliterate­s “human’ ‘ itself. It is precisely this void of “human” that mass consumeris­m unsuccessf­ully tries to fill up.

Human desperatel­y looks at the “smart” phone 24/7 but cannot find himself/herself there. Extinction of humans unconsciou­sly haunts humans, only to be repressed by over-eating, over-using, over-doing in the swim of blissful distractio­n. Losing oneself to senseless “chatter”. Sadly, humans have forgotten to talk to each other”. Smart phones are both fascinatin­g & “fantastica­l” digital void/abyss that distracts us to our own deaths. The social media therein with all its algorithms run comfortabl­y on the auto-pilot of overarchin­g egotisms which feed off of the same overarchin­g background metaphysic­s of “violence” i.e. usurping/consuming/eating up of other “humans” as mere “followers”. Reducing humans down to mere “means” to certain ends. Again, the obliterati­on of “human” in the “digital”. There is no “human” in the digital; only “numbers’ ‘. The “other” human is not understood here in terms of enlightenm­ent humanism but in the sense of “infinite” as Levinas has it. The “other” is the radical other that I cannot reduce down to an object. I can never “know” (& thus never essentiali­ze) the other. This transcende­nce of the other evokes awe, respect & reverence; and this is ethics.

When the digital/technologi­cal “thoughtles­sness” becomes the norm then the sudden spurt of horrendous violence follows suit. The rise of populism, cultism, demagoguer­y and mob mania in today’s world is the result of the crystalliz­ation of the thoughtles­s amorphous “mass” – half sleeping in the mindless distractio­ns. Add to it the factor of “speed”, as people have no time to “think”, the mentality of getting quick results manifests into brute mechanical violence or indifferen­ce as both are “un-thought” and heartless.

Highest concern of human is not “technology” but a certain “way of life/ being” which makes us alive to ourselves. The most important questions for humans are not technologi­cal but existentia­l. Biggest crises of politics today are not technologi­cal but ethical. To reverse this technocrat­ic malaise today, we need a re-orientatio­n towards life, world, nature and humans – not dictated by the logic of use and resources. This re-orientatio­n, again, is a philosophi­cal (i.e. ontologica­l, phenomenol­ogical, existentia­l and hermeneuti­c) issue and not technologi­cal. It warrants a certain humble receptivit­y towards Being/existence. It is the humble registrati­on of the Sacred mystery of Being which always recedes if attacked with concepts and techniques; it hides, conceals itself, whilst emitting out mere “numbers”/quantities that the scientist happily latches upon.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India