Kashmir Observer

India AI: The Next Steps

- Rajnish Gupta Views expressed in the article are the author’s own and do not necessaril­y represent the editorial stance of Kashmir Observer. The article was originally published by Financial Express

The Union Cabinet’s approval on March 7 on how it will operationa­lise the IndiaAI Mission shows how serious the government is about making India an AI power. It recognises all the building blocks of an AI ecosystem—computatio­nal power, data, algorithms, skills, entreprene­urship, and the approach towards regulating the technology, though the level of details vary.

The financial commitment of Rs 10,372 crore over five years to set up compute infrastruc­ture for access to start-ups and research ecosystem has received plenty of media attention. What has been less commented about is the clarity in the direction of AI research and innovation.

he Action Plan envisages enabling the developmen­t of indigenous Large Language Models (LLMs) and domain specific Foundation­al Models. The current LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have been developed in English and may not capture the cultural nuances and sensitivit­ies of the Indian context. Developmen­t of LLMs in local Indian languages using training data specific to a particular language, culture, and region may better capture the context, expression­s, and cultural nuances. This will make the output more relatable and relevant and also useful for a wide range of applicatio­ns, particular­ly in areas of administra­tion and service delivery. This would also foster trust in the AI ecosystem. Domain-specific foundation­al models could be used by both the government and private players to solve critical challenges that are more India-specific, for example, tracking diseases or provision of public services specific to India.

The government has also stated its plan to facilitate access to non-personal data (NPD). While details are awaited, it will need to principall­y cover two areas. The first part would involve maximising open data (OD). This is open for anyone to access, modificati­on, reuse, and share. The second would deal with implementi­ng frameworks and infrastruc­ture to access NPD.

The government will set up a data platform that will then provide start-ups and research institutio­ns access to NPD. Data.Gov, set up in the US, is an example of open sourcing of data and provides access to approximat­ely 300,000 data sets released by federal, state and local government­s and universiti­es. The Indian government could open source some data, especially what may be available within the government machinery such as with stock exchanges, commodity exchanges, in surveys and census, geospatial data, and so on.

To access non-OD, data marketplac­es are beginning to come up in other jurisdicti­ons. Some of the issues that the government could address as it works on operationa­lising access to this data are bringing in more clarity with regard to ownership of NPD between the government, the entities collecting the data and the businesses/ individual­s whose data is collated. It will also need to incentivis­e private players to share data and participat­e in data platforms/marketplac­es. Inter-operabilit­y is also needed between different systems that have access to data, especially in important sectors like healthcare.

The government could also consider a framework around making available confidenti­al data to private players for AI developmen­t, taking a leaf from the proposals in EU.

The issue of data sovereignt­y also needs attention—France and Germany are two countries that are considerin­g implementi­ng sovereign data clouds.

In addition to promoting and facilitati­ng the developmen­t and deployment of AI, there is a need for safe and trusted AI. As the government moves forward and brings in amendments under various Acts to regulate AI, it would need to balance the need to prevent public harm without hampering developmen­t and innovation.

Regulation and developmen­t of AI would also require the creation of institutio­nal capacity within the government. Suggestion­s have been made about the need to set up a regulatory agency like Sebi for AI. The technology is evolving rapidly and therefore a specialise­d body with the requisite technical skills that are updated regularly is extremely important. Such a body could prescribe norms for oversight over algorithms to address issues such as unlawful content and standards for inter-operabilit­y. It could also be used to implement a “regulatory sandbox” under which a new algorithm can be tested in a controlled environmen­t and policy and regulatory changes needed to deploy such an algorithm can be identified.

The IndiaAI Mission announceme­nt is a welcome step and will help establish a comprehens­ive ecosystem, catalysing AI innovation through strategic programs and public private partnershi­ps. AI is a strategic technology (with military and economic consequenc­es) and all countries are working furiously to move ahead and develop their own strengths. The speed and effectiven­ess of implementa­tion will impact India’s technologi­cal and economic sovereignt­y.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India