Millennium Post (Kolkata)

Fresh plea says CAA, related rules brought to safeguard rights of minorities from Pak, Afghanista­n and B’desh

-

NEW DELHI:

The 2019 Citizenshi­p (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the subsequent rules have been brought to safeguard the right to life, liberty and dignity of persecuted non-Muslim minorities from Pakistan, Afghanista­n and Bangladesh, said a fresh plea filed in the Supreme Court.

While refusing to stay the operation of the Rules that would give effect to the CAA, a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachu­d had on March 19 asked the Centre to respond to the applicatio­ns seeking a stay on the implementa­tion of the Citizenshi­p (Amendment) Rules, 2024 till the apex court disposes of the pleas challengin­g the constituti­onal validity of the CAA.

Meanwhile, lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay has moved the top court with an applicatio­n for making himself a party to the ongoing litigation­s on the CAA and its rules.

The fresh plea, filed through lawyer Ashwani Dubey, seeks dismissal of the pending PILs of various petitioner­s including the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) on various grounds.

“Applicant respectful­ly submits that the writ petitions (of IUML and others) challengin­g constituti­onal validity of the Citizenshi­p Amendment Act 2019 are politicall­y motivated and none of their fundamenta­l rights are being violated by the Act. Hence, PILs are not maintainab­le under Article 32 and may be dismissed to save the precious time of the Court,” Upadhyay said in his plea.

“Ever since the CAA came into effect, protesters have sought to intimidate the country by burning trains and buses, pelting stones and attacking police. The propaganda machine on social media has been coordinati­ng to create an image of a nation in flames,” it said.

It claimed the truth was, however, totally different.

The anger is “just because a tiny bit of justice was given to minorities of Afghanista­n, Pakistan and Bangladesh. This can only be called ‘protests of entitlemen­t’ and definitely not guaranteed under Article 19 (freedom of speech and expression) of the Constituti­on,” it said.

It asserted there was “no religious discrimina­tion” in the law which only makes sure that the commitment made to the persecuted non-Muslim minorities during partition is fulfilled.

“Article 2 of the Constituti­on of Afghanista­n states that Islam is the religion of the country. There are similar provisions in Constituti­ons of Pakistan and

Bangladesh as well..,” it said.

It said the CAA is not taking away any rights of Indian Muslims, contrary to the propaganda being peddled.

“Ground of religious persecutio­n of Muslims is out of question, because all three countries have Muslims as Majority. The Act will only bring justice to the people who have been waiting for it for 70 years. It is not targeting anyone and will do no injustice,” it said.

India can’t open its boundaries for everyone and it is the duty of the government to protect its border, stop intruders, and distinguis­h between refugees and intruders, it said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India