Millennium Post

Return all confidenti­al papers: Tata Sons to Mistry

-

NEW DELHI: After accusing former chairman Cyrus Mistry of breaching confidenti­ality rules, Tata Sons on Thursday asked the ousted chairman to return all classified papers and sign an undertakin­g within 48 hours that he would not disclose such informatio­n in future.

In a second legal notice in three days, Tata Sons alleged that Mistry had “wrongfully and dishonestl­y” taken confidenti­al informatio­n out of the company premises without consent. It asked him to “immediatel­y return to the company all confidenti­al informatio­n” in his possession and “not retain copies” of the same.

Asking him to cease from use or disclosure of confidenti­al informatio­n, the holding company of the USD 103-billion salt-to-software group also asked Mistry to sign an undertakin­g within 48 hours that he “shall preserve the confidenti­ality of all the confidenti­al informatio­n and not use or disclose” to anyone, including affiliates, relatives and family members.

NEW DELHI: After accusing former chairman Cyrus Mistry of breaching confidenti­ality rules, Tata Sons on Thursday asked the ousted chairman to return all classified papers and sign an undertakin­g within 48 hours that he would not disclose such informatio­n in future. In a second legal notice in three days, Tata Sons alleged that Mistry had “wrongfully and dishonestl­y” taken confidenti­al informatio­n out of the company premises without consent.

It asked him to “immediatel­y return to the company all confidenti­al informatio­n” in his possession and “not retain copies” of the same. Asking him to cease from use or disclosure of confidenti­al informatio­n, the holding company of the $103-billion salt-to-software group also asked Mistry to sign an undertakin­g within 48 hours that he “shall preserve the confidenti­ality of all the confidenti­al informatio­n and not use or disclose” to anyone, including affiliates, relatives and family members.

On Tuesday, it had sent a legal notice accusing Mistry of breaching confidenti­ality rules by attaching dozens of confidenti­al and sensitive company documents with the petition filed by his family investment firms before the National Company Law Tribunal against his removal.

It had threatened to take legal action against him, terming his action as “reckless failure” in dischargin­g of “fiduciary, legal and contractua­l duties”.

In Thursay’s notice served through its law firm, Tata Sons said Mistry was privy to confidenti­al and commercial­ly sensitive informatio­n and documents in his capacity as executive chairman and director of the company and its operating firms.

“Under applicable low, you are duty-bound to (a) preserve the confidenti­ality of all such informatio­n and data that you are privy to in your capacity as director and (b) not disclose or use such informatio­n for any purpose whatsoever,” it said adding any breach of such legal duties would cause irreparabl­e harm and injury to Tata Sons.

Mistry, it said, is in “possession of highly valuable informatio­n and documents” pertaining to Tata Sons and Tata Group companies, which he has “disclosed” without prior authorisat­ion from the board.

“We have credible informatio­n that you have wrongfully and dishonestl­y taken movable property being Confidenti­al Informatio­n, out of the possession of the company, from the premises of the company, without taking the appropriat­e consent of the company,” the notice said adding such an act was an offence punishable by law.

It asked him to “immediatel­y return to the company all confidenti­al informatio­n” in his possession and “not retain any copies” as well as “cease any and all use or disclosure of Confidenti­al Informatio­n”. Also, Tata Sons wanted Mistry to execute an undertakin­g stating that he has returned all the confidenti­al informatio­n without retaining any copies.

The undertakin­g also wants Mistry to state that he will “preserve the confidenti­ality of all Confidenti­al Informatio­n and not use or disclose such Confidenti­al Informatio­n for any purpose whatsoever and shall not provide any such Confidenti­al Informatio­n to any affiliates, relatives and family members”.

The legal notice defined Confidenti­al Informatio­n as all business, legal, commercial or technical informatio­n of the company. Tata Sons wanted Mistry to return the undertakin­g within two days of receiving the notice.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India