Millennium Post

Wait and watch

-

Recent developmen­ts in Pakistan have given observers reason to believe that their government is maybe serious about cracking down on terrorist organisati­ons that target India. Hafiz Saeed, the mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and head of the Lashkar-e-taiba, was placed under house arrest by Pakistani authoritie­s late last month. They also put its parent political organisati­on Jamaat-ud-dawa (JUD) and another associated body on the terror watch list. Recent history, however, gives New Delhi reason for pause. Despite a mountain of evidence against Saeed and his organisati­on, he has never been convicted in a court of law in Pakistan for want of credible prosecutio­n. New Delhi’s response to the events of last month is laden with scepticism. Vikas Swarup, the spokespers­on for India’s Ministry of External Affairs, continued to question “Pakistan’s sincerity” in dealing with home-grown terror. This apparent change in tack from authoritie­s in Pakistan does not alter the fact that groups like the LET and Jaish-emohammad are responsibl­e for a host of deadly terror attacks on Indian soil. These groups have been central to the Pakistan military-intelligen­ce establishm­ent’s plan of using “non-state actors” to fulfil their strategic objectives against India, especially in the volatile Kashmir region. Moreover, these groups continue to organise rallies and raise funds out in the open without fear of arrest or prosecutio­n, despite India’s repeated demands for credible action. Nonetheles­s, it is imperative to ask what precipitat­ed Saeed’s arrest.

In a recent meeting with Jalil Abbas Jilani, Pakistani High Commission­er to the US on January 11, the United States Assistant Secretary of State raised the issue in the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)’S latest report. According to American officials, the report raised some significan­t objections regarding the activities of JUD, which is known to finance terror activities on Indian soil. If Pakistan fails to address these concerns, Washington has vowed to take stern economic and diplomatic action. American pressure on Pakistan may have also manifested in a possible expansion of US President Donald Trump’s recent ban on Muslim immigrants from seven countries to include Pakistan. Senior officials in the Pakistan military have taken cognizance of this possibilit­y and in a bid to save face have acquiesced to Saeed’s arrest. Influentia­l think-tanks, which have a long-standing associatio­n with the Republican Party, are also advocating stern action against Rawalpindi’s institutio­nal support for terror. Finally, reports indicate that the change of guard in the Pakistan army from Raheel Sharif to General Qamar Javed Bajwa may have resulted in a change of approach to terror groups like the LET and JEM. Bajwa is apparently not too keen on issuing support for them. Only time will tell if he is serious about restrictin­g their activities. China’s possible role has also been posited, although it’s highly unlikely considerin­g their recent actions in the United Nations. These are indeed good signs for India, but no victories should be claimed yet. Rawalpindi has long manipulate­d Washington into funding them while fomenting terror in areas of strategic interest to them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India