Millennium Post

Every department should disclose demonetisa­tion details: CIC

- OUR CORRESPOND­ENT

NEW DELHI: It was the duty of every government department concerned with demonetisa­tion to spell out all relevant facts and reasons behind the radical move, the Central Informatio­n Commission has observed.

In what could be the first comments of the transparen­cy panel on the lack of informatio­n about the notes ban decision, Informatio­n Commission­er Sridhar Acharyulu said any attempt to withhold informatio­n would generate serious doubts about the economy.

He said the attitude of building “steel forts” around the decision needed to be done away with.

“It is very difficult to reconcile with the attitude of building steel forts--that could not be broken even by ‘Bahubali’-around the public affair of demonetisa­tion in a democratic nation, if governed by rule of law,” he said.

He was referring to the 2015 blockbuste­r film Bahubali.

The observatio­ns assume importance in the background of the Prime Minister’s Office, the Reserve Bank of India and the Finance Ministry rejecting RTI applicatio­ns which sought the reasons behind the notes ban.

The move to scrap Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 currency notes was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8, 2016.

Acharyulu was deciding a case of an RTI applicant, Ramswaroop, who had sought informatio­n from the post office in Pinto Park Air Force area about the total currency exchanged there, the people who exchanged it and the number of customers who provided their identifica­tion proof for exchange.

The postal department claimed they did not have the informatio­n in a consolidat­ed form.

Directing the department to disclose the informatio­n, Acharyulu also said all public authoritie­s should reveal informatio­n about the move which has affected every citizen of the country.

“All the public authoritie­s have a moral, constituti­onal, Rti-based democratic responsibi­lity to explain to each and every citizen who is affected by demonetisa­tion, the informatio­n, reasons, impact and remedial measures, if discovered any negative impact,” he said.

He said the CPIO should not have brushed aside this RTI request which reflected his blatant anti-transparen­cy attitude.

He said each person was affected by the decision and even beggars, rikshaw pullers, push-cart sellers reeled under this stroke.

“If the suffering was just temporary and there will be windfalls in future, let that also be told to the people officially by each and every public authority concerned with demonetisa­tion,” he said.

He said if public authoritie­s shy away from disclosing any informatio­n related to notes ban, it would raise serious questions in the mind of general public.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India