Millennium Post

HC asks Kejriwal not to put ‘scandalous’ questions to Jaitley

The Delhi High Court also imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on the Chief Minister after he failed to give a reply in a Rs 10 crore defamation suit filed by Arun Jaitley

- OUR CORRESPOND­ENT

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed Aam Aadmi Party national convenor Arvind Kejriwal not to put “scandalous” questions to Union Minister Arun Jaitley during his cross-examinatio­n in a defamation suit filed against the Delhi Chief Minister and five other AAP leaders.

The high court also imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal after he failed to file a reply in a second Rs 10 crore defamation suit by Jaitley, over the AAP leader’s former lawyer Ram Jethmalani calling Jaitley a “crook” during the cross-examinatio­n.

The fine was imposed by Joint Registrar Pankaj Gupta after Kejriwal failed to file response on the plea, and granted further two more weeks to respond.

Justice Manmohan further said the Chief Minister should conduct crossexami­nation of the senior BJP leader in a dignified manner and in accordance with law.

It said dignity has to be maintained as no person can be subjected to scandalous and abusive language in the garb of cross-examinatio­n.

Jaitley, in the second civil defamation suit against Kejriwal, claimed the objectiona­ble words caused him “permanent harm and disrepute”.

This is a separate case from the ongoing Rs 10 crore Delhi and District Cricket Associatio­n (DDCA) defamation suit against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders that Jaitley filed in 2015.

On May 17, Jaitley and senior advocate Jethmalani clashed in the court, with the Union Minister taking strong on the objectiona­ble word that Jethmalani used in his cross-examinatio­n.

Jethmalani had said that word was used by him on instructio­ns from his Kejriwal; Jaitley then threatened to seek higher damages.

Kejriwal, however, recently denied instructin­g Jethmalani to use such objectiona­ble words.

The second defamation suit stated that “Kejriwal has brazenly and with a malafide intent to cause further prejudice, damage and loss to the name, reputation and credibilit­y of Jaitley has deliberate­ly used the terminolog­y...”

In December 2015, Jaitley had filed a civil defamation suit against Kejriwal and AAP leaders Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh, Raghav Chadha and Deepak Bajpayee, claiming that they made “false and defamatory” statements in the case involving the DDCA, thereby harming his reputation.

Jaitley had sought Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and other AAP leaders in the DDCA case as well.

He had claimed that the AAP leaders attacked him over alleged irregulari­ties and financial bungling in Delhi’s cricket associatio­n, of which he was the President for about 13 years.

 ??  ?? In the second civil defamation suit against Kejriwal, Jaitley claimed the objectiona­ble words used by the former’s lawyer Ram Jethmalani caused him “permanent harm and disrepute”
In the second civil defamation suit against Kejriwal, Jaitley claimed the objectiona­ble words used by the former’s lawyer Ram Jethmalani caused him “permanent harm and disrepute”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India