Millennium Post

FERTILISER­S AND POLLUTION

New pollution norms after three decades will push the sector towards a stringent pollution control regime,

- write Vinay Trivedi and Sugandha Arora Sardana DOWN TO EARTH (The views expressed are strictly personal)

The Indian fertiliser industry is set to implement new pollution norms notified by the Union Ministry of Environmen­t, Forest and Climate Change in December 2017. So far the industry had emission norms only for urea and phosphatic fertiliser plants but the notificati­on has specified emission norms for ammonia, ammonium nitrate and calcium ammonium nitrate, complex fertiliser­s and nitric acid plants for the first time in 29 years.

The industry emits major air pollutants such as particulat­e matter, gaseous NH3, oxides of nitrogen, sulphur, and carbon dioxide. Prilling towers, which manufactur­e urea prills or pellets, are a major source of urea dust particulat­es. Even the wastewater generated possess pollutants such as ammoniacal nitrogen, phosphates, heavy metals, and fluorides in varied amounts, which can pose serious health hazards if not treated. In fact, many fertliser plants have been issued closure notices in the past owing to non-compliance of emission and effluents standards, suggest reports. The new norms are, thus, a welcome move for the sector, which got its first set of norms in January 1988, two years after the Environmen­t Protection Act, 1986 was enacted. Until December 2017, no improvemen­ts or amendments were made in the norms. Thanks to technologi­cal upgradatio­ns in the past decade, it was felt that the sector was ready for new norms, say officials from the Central Pollution Control Board.

New norms are likely to bring improvemen­ts

There are three categories of fertiliser­s manufactur­ed in India - nitrogenou­s, phosphatic, and complex fertiliser­s (which includes nitrogen, phosphorou­s, and potassium nutrients in different ratios). Depending on the type of fertiliser and the plant, the pollutants generated vary and thus, the need for different pollution norms.

The new set of emission norms include limits for nitrogen oxides in ammonia and nitric acid plants, which were missing earlier. Norms have also been introduced for particulat­e matter, gaseous ammonia and total fluoride for Ammonium Nitrate, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (AN/CAN) and complex fertliser (NPK) plants. Even effluent norms have been improved in the notificati­on. The effluent norms since 1988 had different limits for plants commission­ed before and after 1982 due to difference­s in design. However, the new norms are uniform irrespecti­ve of its age. Secondly, permissibl­e limits for key pollutants such as Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen and Free Ammonical Nitrogen have been made stringent in straight nitrogenou­s plants, comprising of UREA/CAN & AN.

Norms are still relaxed for old urea plants

Broadly speaking, there are two kinds of plants, those commission­ed before 1982 and those commission­ed after. The emission norms for particulat­e matter from urea prilling towers continues to be 150 mg/nm3 for older plants commission­ed before 1982. On the other hand, the norms are 50mg/nm3 for plants commission­ed after 1982. Since almost 50 per cent of the plants in India were set up before 1982, it means that most of the urea plants will continue to run with relaxed norms even in the coming years.

An expert from the fertiliser sector who spoke to Down To Earth anonymousl­y reasoned that “The main reason for relaxed norms is that in older urea plants it is very difficult to install advanced pollution control mechanism. The prilling towers are old with convention­al design and their structure and layout don’t support modificati­ons. In addition, space constraint reduces the possibilit­y of putting up new technologi­es for pollution control.”

Permissibl­e limits for particulat­e matter emissions were stringent in the draft

Even though the emission norms have been notified for AN, CAN and NPK fertiliser plants for the first time in almost 3 decades, the new notificati­on allows for relaxed permissibl­e limits for particulat­e matter emissions compared to a July 2015 draft notificati­on. The limit was relaxed from 50 mg/nm3 for all plants in the draft to 150 mg/nm3 for existing plants and 100 mg/nm3 for new plants in the final notificati­on.

When asked why the stated norms were not made uniform and stringent, a Central Pollution Control Board official, who spoke to DTE on the condition of anonymity said, “There is a huge variabilit­y in the processes and products manufactur­ed in AN, CAN and NPK fertiliser plants. Since their emission potentials are different, it is not possible to meet uniform and stringent norms.”

Also, the new set of norms has scrapped the limits for heavy metals (vanadium, arsenic and Chromium). Chromium-based chemicals that were used earlier as algaecide in cooling water system of urea plant are not in use anymore. The notificati­on prohibits the use of chromium as it is highly hazardous. Similarly, vanadium and arsenic which were being used earlier in carbon dioxide removal process in ammonia plant have also been phased out.

While the new norms are a welcome move, merely having norms is not enough. The need of the hour is its effective implementa­tion by the industry and ensuring a strong compliance check system by the pollution control boards.

So far the industry had emission norms only for urea and phosphatic fertiliser plants but the notificati­on has specified emission norms for ammonia, ammonium nitrate and calcium ammonium nitrate, complex fertiliser­s, and nitric acid plants. The industry emits major air pollutants such as particulat­e matter, gaseous NH3, oxides of nitrogen, sulphur, and carbon dioxide

 ?? (Representa­tional Image) ?? Norms for effluent have also been improved in the notificati­on to regulate fertiliser industry
(Representa­tional Image) Norms for effluent have also been improved in the notificati­on to regulate fertiliser industry

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India