Millennium Post

OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE

-

On June 23, 2017, then Union Urban Developmen­t Minister M Venkaiah Naidu had announced the third batch of Smart Cities developmen­t. The list featured the name of Patna which was selected for the Smart City project after overcoming several rounds of rejections.

The moment this historic city passed the Smart City test, residents of Patna and those living in the peripheral suburban areas were filled with imaginatio­n about how their city would soon join the elite club of world-class cities equipped with ultramoder­n amenities. The Bihar government too swung into action and soon commenced developmen­t work by chalking out a foolproof plan and strategy.

Till the rains did not inundate Patna in the closing fringes of September, every cosmetic makeover the city received with the promise of becoming ‘smart’ fit well into the bills of the government as well as civic agencies. And in fact, the people of Patna too seemed satisfied as they never bothered to raise their voices, even when they found that their sewerage system was emptying into the deep drain.

So, does this imply that the Smart City project is the sole villain that has brought shame to this ancient city which was once the proud capital of the flourishin­g Maurya and Gupta dynasties?

“No. This is just one cause among several other factors that have disturbed the perfectly designed drainage system of the city. The prime cause for the existing system’s failure is the defunct Patna Municipal Corporatio­n (PMC) and its highly corrupt officials who care little about the problems of the common people,” explains Vinay Kumar ‘Pappu’, former deputy mayor of Patna Municipal Corporatio­n. Pappu was the deputy mayor of the city for two terms from 2010-12 and then 2017-19.

“The officials of PMC had never imagined that Patna would receive such massive rainfall and they were thus, conducting the drainage cleaning works as per their own whims and fancies,” he added.

“There is a huge dearth of manpower in PMC as no recruitmen­t has been undertaken for the posts of Group C and D staff for the past several years, especially since the civic body has outsourced the work to Bihar Urban Infrastruc­ture Developmen­t Corporatio­n (BUIDCO). So, drains and nullas were not declogged or desilted for several years and that resulted in such

When most politician­s were busy indulging in their choicest game of blaming each other for the Patna floods, former MP Rajesh Ranjan, alias Pappu Yadav, was crisscross­ing flooded areas with a team of volunteers to reach out to the floodhit victims. He was the only politician who was visible on ground and truly helping victims by providing water, food packets and even assisting the aged reach safer places.

“The help he extended to people was not just for just publicity. He and his volunteers were moving in a tractor and getting down to help the people,” a Rajender Nagar-based doctor said. Commenting on the crisis, Yadav said, “I might have visited hundreds of houses in the flood-affected areas. Whether it’s the poor or the rich – all are helpless. We are providing daily needs items as they don’t have any access to it.” severe water stagnation,” the former deputy mayor explained.

“The waterloggi­ng or urban floods in Patna are not at all a natural calamity as is being claimed by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and his administra­tion. Such floods make us believe how man-made disasters are created by a lacklustre, almost non-existent municipal corporatio­n and corrupt urban developmen­t authoritie­s,” Pappu added.

“Whatever image building exercise was done by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, it has all been washed out by the Patna flood. We had never dreamt of facing such a situation in Patna that too due to rainfall,” opined Girdhar Jhunjhunwa­la, a resident of the city.

“It is a total management failure. Right from Chief Minister Nitish Kumar to clerk-level employees of PMC, everyone is responsibl­e for making the city a living hell,” Jhunjhunwa­la, a victim of government apathy, added.

“Since water has been cleared from affected areas with the help of dewatering machines brought from Chhattisga­rh, the major concern is removing silt and human wastes from homes,” he said.

“It’s so horrifying to see thick layers of silt containing human waste inside our houses. It has made our lives a living example of hell and the worst part is that the government is not going to remove these wastes. We have to do it on our own and at any cost as safai karamchari­s are charging exorbitant rates,” he said.

The sump houses have a major role to play in these horrific Patna floods as out of 39 sump houses in the Patna municipal area, about 38 sump houses failed to work as they were all found to be defunct due to different undignifie­d reasons.

Patna is geographic­ally bound by waterbodie­s on three sides, and is situated at a lower slope than the surroundin­g water bodies, in the shape of a bowl.

Commenting on Patna’s geographic­al conditions, Dr Deepak Kumar, an Assistant Professor of Geography in Daudnagar College of Magadh University, said, “In situations where the ground is at a lower level, a sump plays an important role in sucking out stormwater and thereby minimising waterloggi­ng.”

Surprising­ly, big sump houses with higher waterlifti­ng capacities installed in Jogipur, Saidpur and Kankarbagh were found non-functional. If all these pumps had been functional, they could have pumped out 10,689 million litres per day (MLD).

The maintenanc­e and administra­tive control of sump houses was in the hands of Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad, but after the absorption of Jal Parishad into BUIDCO, the responsibi­lity of running the sump houses was outsourced to private agencies.

The administra­tive units lacked coordinati­on as BUIDCO and PMC were on two different planes regarding preparedne­ss before the heavy rains and also during rescue, and both were clueless about the steps to be initiated.

Undoubtedl­y, the government is responsibl­e but residents of Patna are also equally responsibl­e for the man-made disaster as in connivance with the government authoritie­s, people have grabbed government land. Encroachme­nt has occurred at such a level that apart from parks and government buildings, there is hardly any open space in the city.

Blind, unplanned developmen­t is taking place in Patna. Bus stands and several institutio­ns have been built on existing wetlands, which used to absorb the rainwater. In the recent past, Mithapur bus stand, National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Chanakya National Law University (CNLU), Aryabhatta Knowledge University and Chandra Gupta Institute of Management (CIMP) have all been built on Mithapur wetlands.

Commenting on the causes of waterloggi­ng in Patna, Disaster Management Department Principal Secretary Pratyaya Amrit told Millennium Post that the excessive rainfall was the prime cause.

“There was excessive rainfall for which no forecast was given by IMD. We had a red alert warning for September 28 by IMD but Patna was not on that list,” said Amrit, who was felicitate­d with the Prime Minister’s Excellence Award in Public Administra­tion in 2011.

“The forecast of September 28 issued by IMD was for Madhubani, Darbhanga, Supaul, Araria, Kishanganj, Jamui and Gaya. Since there was drought-like situation in Gaya and Jamui, we were quite satisfied that 300 mm rainfall for these two districts would be of great relief to paddy farmers,” he further stated.

“In light of the warning for other parts of Bihar, we had requisitio­ned four teams of NDRF from Guwahati on September 26. The NDRF team had arrived in Patna on September 27 and rain started peltering on September 28, which continued for the next 36 hours. We had deployed the NDRF team for the rescue operation,” he said, adding that Patna received 400 mm rainfall as per the local administra­tion’s rainwater measuring machine.

“The evacuation was very fast. The government evacuated about 62,000 stranded people from most affected areas of Rajender Nagar and Kankarbagh. The areas of Rajender Nagar and Kankarbagh are dominated by doctors, private nursing homes and clinics, and no death case was reported from these areas,” the senior officer added.

The Patna floods also brought both the alliance partners Janata Dal (United) and Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) on two different pages over owning responsibi­lity for the debacle in the civic system.

Defending the Bihar CM, party spokespers­on K C Tyagi said that those pointing fingers at the CM should know that Patna has a BJP mayor for the past 15 years. “Patna has a BJP mayor for the past 15 years, the urban developmen­t minister is theirs, both MPS are from BJP, as are all the five MLAS – but still the CM is at fault,” Tyagi said.

Union Minister Giriraj Singh had held both Nitish Kumar and Sushil Modi responsibl­e for what unfolded in Patna after the heavy rains.

Nitish Kumar also faced sharp criticism for terming it as a repercussi­on of climate change. “The climate is changing and this heavy rainfall is due to the Hathiya Nakshatra. Such rainfall is common during the Hathiya”, Kumar had said while trying to mock the press gathered in front of him.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India