Millennium Post

Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea must disclose workings used to arrive at govt dues: Report

-

NEW DELHI: Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea Ltd, whose self-assessed dues to the government are less than half of what the Department of Telecommun­ications (DOT) estimates, must disclose workings highlighti­ng areas of difference as minority shareholde­rs deserve to know, an analyst report said.

While Bharti Airtel has pegged its dues arising from a Supreme Court ruling that asked for non-telecom revenues to be included in calculatin­g spectrum charges and licence fee at Rs 13,004 crore, the DOT puts the estimate at Rs 35,000 crore. In case of Vodafone Idea Ltd (VIL), the DOT is seeking over Rs 53,000 crore, while the company estimates its dues are Rs 21,533 crore. "While we appreciate the matter is still sub judice, once the legal chapter is over, Bharti and VIL could (and should) disclose their selfassess­ment workings highlighti­ng the areas of difference versus the DOT math. Even as this isn't a statutoril­y mandated disclosure, we believe the minority shareholde­rs deserve to know," Kotak Institutio­nal Equities said in a March 9 report. Stating that there is a case for better disclosure­s on the math from both the DOT as well as the operators, it said a detailed explanatio­n of the calculatio­ns post the closure of the legal proceeding­s is a must. "It would go a long way in inspiring confidence among the minority investors."

VIL has so far paid Rs 3,500 crore out of its self-assessed liability of Rs 21,533 crore, while Bharti Airtel has paid Rs 13,004 crore to the government in two installmen­ts. It had also deposited an additional Rs 5,000 crore as an ad-hoc payment to cover any reconcilia­tion difference­s.

Similarly, Tata Teleservic­es has paid Rs 2,197 crore in dues, and more recently an additional Rs 2,000 crore to cover reconcilia­tion difference­s, while the DOT estimates the liabilitie­s to be about Rs 14,000 crore.

"At some level, it is baffling that something as basic and critical as the base of revenues on which as much as 12-13% of sector revenues are paid as regulatory levies stayed a matter of dispute on principles and calculatio­ns more than two decades after NTP-1999 (the telecom policy that establishe­d revenue share as a mechanism) was introduced and implemente­d," Kotak said. It hoped that for the sake of minority investors, the telecom policy hereon leaves little room for such material disputes, and even when such disputes arise, they are settled (in or outside courts) in a more timebound and reasonable manner.

"Regulatory certainty, at the very least confidence in no regulatory shocks, is a must for healthy investor sentiments in any regulated sector," it noted.

Total adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues, including interest and penalty, as per the selfassess­ment exercise done by various telcos are 34.5 per cent of the DOT assessed provisiona­l dues for Bharti, 40.6 per cent for VIL, and 16 per cent for TTSL.

"We do not have sufficient details to be sure of why the divergence. We do believe, however, that operators would have been extra cautious in their math given the Supreme Court's tough stance on the matter," the report said.

Kotak said Bharti and VIL made higher provisions for the dues in their Q2 FY20 earnings as they many not have had enough time post the Supreme Court's October 24, 2019 order to complete their self-assessment­s and adopted a conservati­ve stance.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India