Reduction in syllabus only one-time measure: CBSE
Syllabus rationalisation move receives mixed reactions from school reps
NEW DELHI: The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) on Wednesday claimed that the reduction in syllabus announced by the board is being interpreted “differently” and the move is only a onetime measure for the 2020-21 academic session in view of the COVID-19 situation.
The clarification by the board came amid a row over certain chapters being dropped from the curriculum.
“The reduction of syllabus from classes 9 to 12 has been interpreted differently. Contrary to some of the impressions being created, it is clarified that the rationalization of syllabus up to 30 per cent has been undertaken for nearly 190 subjects for the academic session 2020-21 as a one-time measure only,” CBSE Secretary Anurag Tripathi said.
The board claimed the objective of rationalisation is to reduce the exam stress of students due to the prevailing health emergency and prevent learning gaps. It asserted that no question shall be asked from the reduced syllabus in the board exams 2020-21 only. “The schools have also been directed to follow the alternative academic calendar prepared by NCERT for transacting the curriculum. Therefore, each of the topics that have been wrongly portrayed as deleted have been covered under alternative academic calender which is already in force for all the affiliated schools of the board,” Tripathi said. On Tuesday, the board had notified that it rationalised by up to 30 per cent the syllabus for classes 9 to 12 for the academic year 2020-21 to reduce course load on students amid the COVID-19 crisis.
Among the chapters dropped after the rationalisation exercise are lessons on democracy and diversity, demonetisation, nationalism, secularism, India's relations with its neighbours and growth of local governments in India. Meanwhile, the HRD Ministry maintained that the curriculum has been rationalised while retaining core elements. However, school representatives raised concerns over the lack of clarity on whether reduction of syllabus will impact syllabus of entrance examinations like NEET and JEE.
The academicians also claimed that it appears more importance was given to “political considerations” than academics in reducing the syllabus. Attacking the government, BSP MP Kunwar Danish Ali took a dig at the Ministry of Human Resource Development, saying it wants education based on `Whatsapp university' forwards. The Left parties accused the government of using the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to “advance” its own agenda by deleting sections in the CBSE curriculum dealing with India's plurality. The CPI condemned the move and said it was a “nefarious attempt to implement the Hindutva agenda of RSS using COVID-19 restrictions in the school syllabus”.
Opposition leader Sharad Yadav criticised the CBSE'S move, accusing the central government of taking a “unilateral and undemocratic step”. The NCP also attacked the government, saying the ruling BJP wants to do away with democracy and secularism.