SP's Aviation

Ashok Kumar Gupta, Secretary, Defence Production

In a rare media interactio­n with SP’s Aviation, Ashok Kumar Gupta, Secretary, Defence Production, outlined his vision for defence manufactur­ing in India and addressed a wide range of subjects including ‘Make in India’, DPP 2016, defence offsets, role of D

- For the complete interview, refer to SP’s Military Yearbook 2016-2017

SP’s Aviation (SP’s): The new DPP 2016 is being referred to as game changer for the sector. How do you see it altering the Indian defence growth story?

Secretary: The new Defence Procuremen­t Procedure (DPP) 2016 has come into effect from April 1, 2016. It focuses on achieving the ‘Make in India’ vision by according priority to ‘Buy (Indian–IDDM)’ and ‘Buy (Indian)’ categories. It also mandates increased indigenous content. The ‘Make’ procedure has been simplified with provisions for funding of 90 per cent of developmen­t cost by the government to Indian industry and earmarking projects not exceeding developmen­t cost of ` 10 crore (government funded) and ` 3 crore (industry funded) for the micro, small and medium enterprise­s (MSMEs).

This would create an ecosystem in defence manufactur­ing by harnessing the capabiliti­es of Indian private sector specially MSMEs and inculcate the R&D culture in the sector.

“INDIA IS IN THE MIDST OF MODERNISIN­G ITS ARMED FORCES AND IT IS ESTIMATED THAT $250 BILLION WILL BE SPENT ON CAPITAL PROCUREMEN­T IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS”

SP’s: In your opinion, what are the new key points of DPP 2016 for a foreign original equipment manufactur­er (OEM) looking at Indian market? Secretary: India is in the midst of modernisin­g its armed forces and it is estimated that $250 billion will be spent on capital procuremen­t in the next 10 years. In the new Defence Procuremen­t Procedure 2016, ‘Buy (Indian-IDDM)’, ‘Buy (Indian)’, ‘Buy & Make (Indian)’ are the most preferred categories which means that increasing­ly request for proposals (RFPs) will be issued to the domestic industry. The only way for the foreign OEMs to leverage domestic demand is to tie up with domestic companies either for collaborat­ive R&D followed by production or through transfer of technology for production through joint ventures or they can set up their own manufactur­ing base.

In addition, a numbers of potential ‘Make’ projects have been identified by the department; which are likely to follow ‘Make’ procedure for developmen­t-cum-procuremen­t. The foreign OEMs can collaborat­e with the Indian vendor, the prime contractor, for developmen­t for defence equipment.

Provisions have also been introduced to allow foreign OEM to select Indian production agency of its choice for transfer of technology for maintenanc­e infrastruc­ture.

Moreover, offset implementa­tion process has been made flexible by allowing change of Indian offset partners (IOPs) and offset components, even in signed contracts. Foreign OEMs are now not required to indicate the details of IOPs and products at the time of signing of contracts.

Services as an avenue of offset have been reinstated with certain conditiona­lities.

SP’s: The biggest pain point of foreign OEMs today is the time that India takes to decide on any defence procuremen­t. What is being done to cut this time down and expedite the whole procuremen­t process?

Secretary: The Ministry has introduced many provisions in DPP 2016 in order to address the issues of pendency/delays in procuremen­t process. Some of them are: with proposal for seeking acceptance of necessity (AoN). ‘Buy’ and ‘Buy and Make’ categories and from two years to one year in ‘Buy & Make (Indian)’ category. - posals have been reduced. - ther reduced in DPP 2016 as compared to earlier versions. defence contracts was one of major hurdles in progressin­g the cases. Guidelines for handling of complaints have now been notified. incorporat­ed. recommende­d in DPP 2016. Indian production agency of its choice for transfer of technology. Evaluation Committee (TEC) stages will not be automatica­lly retracted; they can be processed with due justificat­ion and approval of DAC. SP’s: Another major sticking point with foreign OEMs is cancellati­on of tenders, even after announcing the L-1. Why does it happen so frequently and what are the solutions so that these can be avoided in the future? Secretary: Does not pertain to defence production, so I won’t be able to comment on this.

SP’s: There have been series of clearances of various programmes however actual contracts being signed are still not that many. Hence the sense still persists that the concrete modernisat­ion process is still something that remains a pipe dream. How do you respond to this?

Secretary: Defence procuremen­t cycle has typically been longer on account of various factors such as long and exhaustive allweather trials, small vendor base, etc. Therefore, the AoN acorded by government takes three to four years to fructify into contracts.

Neverthele­ss, 108 contracts with total value of ` 1,12,736.81 crore have been signed for capital procuremen­t of defence equipment during the last two financial years (2014-15 and 201516), out of which 73 contracts involving a value of ` 72,303.34 crore were signed with Indian vendors. Therefore, it shall suffice to say that the government is committed towards defence modernisat­ion with maximum participat­ion of Indian vendors.

SP’s: Blacklisti­ng of companies! What is latest on the policy of banning companies for presumed wrongdoing? And how do we plan to address the scenario of single vendor situation?

Secretary: The guidelines of the Ministry of Defence for penalties in business dealings with entities applicable for both capital and revenue procuremen­t of goods and services have been approved by the Defence Acquisitio­n Council (DAC) in November 2016 and promulgate­d on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) website. MoD is reviewing the existing cases of suspension/ ban/blacklisti­ng, etc., against vendors in the light of the guidelines.

With regard to single vendor situation, DPP 2016 has been suitably amended as per which single vendor cases at the bid submission and TEC stages will not be automatica­lly retracted.

SP’s: What are your expectatio­ns from the upcoming Aero India 2017?

Secretary: Through Aero India, the government provides a common platform to leading national and internatio­nal manufactur­ers/suppliers of aerospace sector to share their business plan on various topics related to the sectors such as integratio­n of Indian aerospace industry into global supply chain, creation of infrastruc­ture, enhancing rural-regional connectivi­ty, empowering and incentivis­ing Indian MSMEs in defence and aerospace sector, etc.

Bolstering ‘Make in India’ would be the major theme of Aero India 2017. The government expects to have maximum participat­ion of all stakeholde­rs specially foreign OEMs, Indian states and leading Indian defence companies during Aero India 2017 and to have successful B2B or G2B meetings, fructifyin­g into joint ventures/tie-ups/technology sharing agreements in the near future.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India