SP's LandForces

Build Capacity, Strengthen Interopera­bility

While the Indian Army is continuous­ly working on bettering its C4I2SR capabiliti­es, there is need for more focus and accelerati­on of capacity building in this context. Equally important is achieving interopera­bility amongst the three services since future

- LT GENERAL (RETD) P.C. KATOCH

INDIAN ARMY’S CAPACITY BUILDING in C4I2SR comes up for discussion time and again while focus on similar capability of the Indian Military remains peripheral. The reason for the latter is essentiall­y HQ Integrated Defence Staff (IDS) having come up as a separate HQ instead of being integrated into the Ministry of Defence (MoD) sans any worthwhile clout in the absence of a Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) having been appointed. The tactical command, control, communicat­ions and informatio­n system (Tac C3I) which essentiall­y is the mainstay of the Army’s C4I2SR is plodding along with customary hiccups courtesy in-house red-tapism, a Defence Procuremen­t Policy not matching with fast paced technologi­cal changes, lack of overall focus and understand­ing of technology. Urgency of time factor appears lost, indicating that the importance of informatio­n as a strategic asset appears unclear.

Tac C3I

Indian Army’s Tac C3I comprises the artillery command, control and communicat­ions system (ACCCS), air defence control and reporting system (ADC&RS), battlefiel­d surveillan­ce system (BSS), battlefiel­d management system (BMS), all of which have been/are being developed directly under the Directorat­e General of Informatio­n Systems (DGIS) and will be integrated through the Command Informatio­n Decision Support System (CIDSS), also being developed by the DGIS. The Tac C3I will also integrate the Indian Army’s electronic warfare system (EWS) and electronic intelligen­ce system (ELINT) operating under Military Operations and Military Intelligen­ce respective­ly. The Tac C3I is to provide state-of-the-art C4I2 connectivi­ty within the Indian Army at Corps HQ and below levels. Upward connectivi­ty from Corps HQ to Army HQ level is to be provided through the Army Strategic Operationa­l Informatio­n Disseminat­ion System (ASTROIDS), also being developed under the aegis of the DGIS. The current status of these various systems is as under:

This is the first operationa­l informatio­n system (OIS) that has been fielded in the Indian Army that provides complete automation of artillery tasks from the command post to the gun end. The final phase (Phase 3) in the field is nearing completion.

Required to integrate with IAF’s air defence system, the test bed appears delayed by another four to five months and may commence by September-October this year.

In developmen­t of the BSS that is to integrate Indian Army’s total surveillan­ce resources, the Bharat Electronic­s Ltd (BEL) appears to be having the same problems as it had in developing the ACCCS—bulk imported hardware and technology but limited indigenous capacity in applicatio­ns, design and software customisat­ion. Hopefully, the test bed will begin in the near future.

Project BMS, designed pan-Army,

ACCCS:

ADC&RS:

BSS:

BMS:

for providing real time updated operationa­l picture at battalion and regiment level, underwent an almost three years delay within Army HQ because of the lack of delimitati­on between the BMS and the future infantry soldier system (F-INSAS) being developed by the Directorat­e General of Infantry (DG Inf). BMS was approved last year by the Defence Acquisitio­n Council (DAC) as a ‘Make India’ project, following which the DG Acquisitio­n ordered an Integrated Project Management Study (IPMT), which is currently ongoing and should be completed by the end of the year.

Being developed by BEL, the status and delays are the same as mentioned in the case of the BSS above.

The concept of integratio­n through the CIDSS was accepted in principle sometime back and implementa­tion action is likely to begin in Phase 2 of these systems, once CIDSS is developed.

Currently, anomalies in the system developed by the Institute for System Study and Analysis (ISSA) that functions under the Defence Research and Developmen­t Organisati­on (DRDO) are being addressed by the ASROID Induction Cell (AIC) of the DGIS.

CIDSS:

EWS & ELINT:

ASTROIDS:

Surveillan­ce

No new radars and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been inducted by the Indian Army. The move to identify and induct MAVs that have already emerged as veritable force multiplier­s in other armies, has not progressed much predominan­tly since the Infantry has been focused more on the FINSAS. This is despite the DRDO designing a range of MAVs (Black Kite, Golden Hawk and Pushpak already developed) but availabili­ty of other indigenous products in the market like the ‘Netra’ by Idea Forge, a spider like MAV suited for all types of operations including counterter­rorism and counter-insurgency or the MAV with an infra red sensor developed by Aurora Integrated Systems. developmen­t of various OIS, running on hard scale authorisat­ion of officers since long, were managing their respective charges with difficulty. Though PMO is a globally accepted concept, PMOs in DGIS were scrapped some months back and replaced with cells that have even lesser authorisat­ion of officers than what were posted on hard scale in the PMOs. The adverse effects in terms of meeting timelines are evident.

Defence Procuremen­t Policy (DPP):

The yearly review of the DPP is a cosmetic exercise grossly unsuited to procuremen­t of informatio­n systems considerin­g the fast pace of technologi­cal changes. Review within MoD has little meaning. The yearly review should actually be outsourced to think tanks incorporat­ing both the DRDO and the private industry.

Implicatio­ns of the National Remote Data Policy worked out by the Group of Ministers (GoM) during 2011 are that OIS henceforth will only have one metre resolution. This is a retrograde step as half metre resolution is already available on Google to the terrorists and insurgents and our adversarie­s would be looking for something even better.

Remote Data Policy:

Informatio­n-Strategic Asset

The above indicates that somewhere we are losing sight of considerin­g informatio­n as a strategic asset. Even the planned reorganisa­tion of Pakistan’s General Headquarte­rs envisages Signals being placed under Informatio­n Systems. In our case, there is a move to elevate the DGMO to a Principal Staff Officer (PSO) and place DGIS under him. However, the DGMO not only has no staff from Informatio­n Systems, as is the case with the DCOAS (IS&T), but officers in sections of Signals under DGMO have been responsibl­e for stonewalli­ng /delaying OIS of the DGIS; example being the unwarrante­d delays posed in case of CIDSS. The BMS-FINSAS delimitati­on impasse too was because of the DGMO. If merger of Signals with DGIS is not acceptable, it would be more prudent to elevate the DGIS to a PSO and place him directly under the Vice Chief.

Winning Factor

Capitalisa­tion of informatio­n in warfare requires no emphasis. Superiorit­y of C4I2SR will be a major winning factor that would facilitate battlefiel­d transparen­cy, real time/ near real time exchange of informatio­n vertically and horizontal­ly, assist decision-making by commanders at all levels by accelerati­ng the decision-action cycle, telescope the sensor to shooter gap, enable engagement with best weaponry in requisite quantum and monitor post-engagement effects.

While the Indian Army is continuous­ly working on bettering its C4I2SR capabiliti­es, there is need for more focus and accelerati­on of capacity building in this context. Equally important is achieving interopera­bility amongst the three services since future operations would necessaril­y be joint; and without interopera­bility, combat capability of our military in combat cannot be optimised.

 ??  ?? Electronic Warfare Jammer
Electronic Warfare Jammer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India