The Asian Age

Futile film fetters

-

It would be a cause for great disappoint­ment if the Shyam Benegal committee’s recommenda­tions on restrictin­g the censor board’s powers to merely classify movies are not implemente­d. The committee’s thinking was along modern lines, in conformity with internatio­nal practices wherein artistic freedom is fully supported and censorship is passé. The proposed system would warn people about the possible content of a film they may find offensive or for minors to be accompanie­d by adults. A number of distinguis­hed film personalit­ies went through the system and came to the conclusion that our censor board’s practices date back to the time movies were first made in India in the early 20th century. To dump their proposals now would be to exclude our entire film- making process from modernity.

Administra­tive and political control of films exists only in totalitari­an or conservati­ve societies and regimes. It is a crying shame if it is true that planned reforms are being put off only to protect the leading personalit­ies of the ruling party. The debate over a particular film pitting the merits of a politician against the demerits of another is said to be central to what is happening now with the Benegal committee proposals being put in cold storage. Such is the narrow vision of politician­s that a whole creative industry must suffer controls. India is not North Korea in matters such as freedom of the creative arts. In any case, the fetters placed on our films are futile in a time when cinematic content is available uncensored on internatio­nal Net- based film channels available as subscripti­on services. We must recognise the mores of the age and change suitably.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India