The Asian Age

Law allows 1 secy not 21: Centre

City can have only 1 parliament­ary secretary attached to CM

- AGE CORRESPOND­ENT NEW DELHI, JULY 13

Opposing the appointmen­t of 21 parliament­ary secretarie­s by the Aam Aadmi Party government, the Centre on Wednesday told the Delhi high court that it could have only one attached to the chief minister of Delhi as per the existing provisions of law.

“That the post of parliament­ary secretarie­s neither finds place in the Constituti­on of India, nor does it find place in the Delhi Members of Legislativ­e Assembly ( Removal of Disqualifi­cation) Act of 1997, except for the post of parliament­ary secretary to the chief minister.

“Therefore, appointmen­t of 21 parliament­ary secretarie­s vide the impugned order dated March 13, 2015, is not covered by the law,” the ministry of home affairs ( MHA) told a bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal.

The MHA, represente­d by Central government standing counsel Jasmeet Singh, made the submission in an affidavit filed in response to the court’s notice to the Centre on a PIL filed by an NGO seeking quashing of chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s March 13 order appointing 21 AAP MLAs as parliament­ary secretarie­s.

In its affidavit, the MHA also said the Delhi government had tried to legalise the appointmen­t of the 21 parliament­ary secretarie­s by amending the Delhi Members of Legislativ­e Assembly ( Removal of Disqualifi­cation) Act, but the President has withheld his assent to the amendment bill.

The high court did not hear arguments in the matter on Wednesday after the Delhi government said that a petition has been moved before Election Commission for disqualifi­cation of the 21 MLAs and the poll panel has issued notice in that.

The bench, thereafter, listed the matter for hearing on September 8.

On October 7 last year, the AAP government had defended its order 21 AAP MLAs as parliament­ary secretarie­s, saying this was done to assist the ministers and ensure harmonious functionin­g.

The AAP government had told the court that no office akin to the council of ministers has been created and no additional hierarchy imposed upon the Legislativ­e Assembly.

It had also stated that the parliament­ary secretarie­s were not given any access to confidenti­al documents which are exclusivel­y within the domain of the minister. The NGO, Rashtriya Mukti Morcha, had claimed in its plea that the chief minister had issued “unconstitu­tional and illegal order” in gross violation of the constituti­onal provisions and the Transactio­n of Business of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi rules, 1993.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India