The Asian Age

Agri-tax can prevent flow of stash into farming

- OLGA TELLIS MUMBAI, JUNE 6

Niti Aayog member Bibek Debroy raised a hornet’s nest with his suggestion that agricultur­e should be taxed. Agricultur­e has always been considered a sacred cow that could not be taxed and sensing the sensitivit­y of the issue Union finance minister Arun Jaitley, who was in Moscow at that time, was forced to issue a statement. “To obviate any confusion on the subject, and said “I categorica­lly state that the Central Government has no plan to impose any tax on agricultur­e income,” adding that he had read the Niti Aayog report entitled ‘Income Tax on Agricultur­e Income’.

Arvind Panagariya, Niti Aayog vice-chairman, also said told reporters at that time “How can we talk about taxing farmers’ income when 80 per cent of rural areas are connected to agricultur­e and we are talking about doubling farmers’ income.” He even went further to say that the idea was to plug loopholes to prevent non-agricultur­ists from converting their black money into white by showing it as agricultur­e income.

No one can agree more with this than farmers’ leader Vijay Jawandhia who points out that an interestin­g fallout if agricultur­e is taxed, is it will stop the flow of black money into green agricultur­e. The rich urban businessme­n, politician­s, bureaucrat­s, actors etc., with surplus unaccounte­d money, invest in farms as the profits are tax-free.

In 2010, the media went overboard about how Bollywood icon Amitabh Bachchan and his family bought nearly three to four hectares of land in Uttar Pradesh worth totally around `3 crore and probably got the saat-bara document which confirms they were farmers. But this is digressing. The point is that famous or otherwise, people with surplus or unaccounte­d money do invest in agricultur­e.

Mr Jawandhia said considerin­g that income of `2.5 lakh a year is free, how many farmers earn this annually?

The government, he said, “would also have to come out with a modus operandi for calculatin­g the farmer’s taxable income. For instance, it will have to calculate the depreciati­on on soil, implements, machinery like tractors. We have no problem,” he says, adding that the Commission for Agricultur­al Costs and Prices will have to be more transparen­t.

Mr Jawandhia said the so-called success stories in agricultur­e were mostly from people who had other sources of regular income as they could afford to take risks if they own four acres of land.

The government would have to come out with a white paper to show how many acres of land a family would have to own to earn over `2.5 lakh annually from agricultur­e.

This would be equal to a class IV government employee who gets a minimum wage of `18,000 a month according to the Seventh Pay Commission. Pointing out the discrimina­tion against farmers Mr Jawandhia said urban individual­s get loans for purchasing refrigerat­ors and cars etc., but a farmer cannot get a loan to dig a well in his farm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India