The Asian Age

SC fires shots at BCCI bosses

- J. VENKATESAN with agency inputs

The Supreme Court on Thursday warned officebear­ers of the Board of Control for Cricket in India of serious consequenc­es for putting hurdles in the implementa­tion of the Lodha Committee reforms and said they would have to fall in line to comply with the earlier directions.

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A.M. Kanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachu­d told Puneet Bali, counsel for BCCI acting president C.K. Khanna, joint secretary Amitabh Choudhary and treasurer Anirudh Chaudhary, who were present in court that they could not defy the court’s order.

Bali submitted that the draft constituti­on was beyond the scope of the Lodha panel’s recommenda­tions and the apex court judgment.

“If the aforesaid three office-bearers do not give suggestion­s in accordance with the judgement of this court, there shall be very serious consequenc­es,” the bench said.

“Because of their unnecessar­y attitude and obstinate behaviour, the amended constituti­on has not been framed. We will issue contempt. Despite our order, nothing was done,” it added. The bench asked the three office-bearers to be present even on the next date of hearing.

It, however, said it would be open to them to give suggestion­s to the Committee of Administra­tors (CoA) for a new constituti­on.

The bench said that it would re-look at certain issues, including the One State-One Vote rule ruling, which has been a bone of contention as all BCCI state units have shown their reservatio­n over the particular point.

In response to the earlier order senior counsel Parag Tripathi for the CoA informed the court that a draft BCCI constituti­on had been prepared and sent to all the associatio­n but till now there was no response. The bench made it clear that the suggestion­s should be strictly in accordance with the earlier judgment.

Tripathi presented a status report of Committee of Administra­tors and said the CoA wanted a direction for the removal of the office-bearers of the BCCI for non-compliance of Lodha panel reforms. The CoA had asked the apex court to hand over the “governance, management and administra­tion” of the BCCI to them, further stating that they would need the help of a profession­al group, currently headed by BCCI chief executive Rahul Johri, to run the board.

It said, “It is only fair that the current office-bearers be treated in the same manner because a further period of six months have elapsed since the said office-bearers submitted their undertakin­gs and reforms mandated by this Court have still not been implemente­d.

“It is clear that current office-bearers are not in position to make good on their undertakin­gs and ensure that reforms mandated by this court is implemente­d.”

The bench posted the matter for further hearing on October 30.

On the last date of hearing, the apex court had expressed displeasur­e that the directions given by the apex court and its order on the recommenda­tions of the Lodha panel have not yet been implemente­d.

Cricket Associatio­n of Bihar, through its secretary Aditya Verma, had earlier targetted Amitabh Choudhary in the apex court for allegedly disregardi­ng the court’s direction by inviting disqualifi­ed cricket administra­tors to attend the board’s meetings. The court, however, had said it would first go by the CoA’s fourth status report and then look into the contempt petition filed by CAB.

The apex court had on July 18 last year in its verdict accepted most of the recommenda­tions of the Justice R.M. Lodha committee to reform the BCCI following charges of largescale mal-administra­tion in the cash-rich cricket body.

 ??  ?? C.K. Khanna
C.K. Khanna
 ??  ?? Amitabh Choudhary
Amitabh Choudhary

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India