The Asian Age

SC junks plea seeking cuts in Padmavati

- J. VENKATESAN

Amid threats to actors and makers of controvers­ial film Padmavati, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition seeking deletion of allegedly objectiona­ble scenes from the Bollywood movie, saying the plea was “premature”.

The apex court refused to interfere with the release of the film, whose makers have voluntaril­y put off its release beyond the scheduled date of December 1, pointing out that the Central Board of Film Certificat­ion ( CBFC) is yet to grant certificat­ion to the movie.

A three- judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, dismissed the public interest writ petition and said, “Our ( court) interferen­ce will tantamount to prejudging the matter. We do not intend to do so. Needless to say that the admitted pleadings are premature.” Petitioner advocate M. L. Sharma submitted before the bench, which also included Justices A. M. Kanwilkar and D. Y. Chandrachu­d,

that though the CBFC had not issued certificat­ion to the film, its songs allegedly projecting Rani Padmavati as a dancer.

The CJI said, “The Censor Board has a statutory duty. How are they going to decide is their job. Can we say that you decide in a particular manner? Can we injunct the Censor Board not to exercise its statutory duty?”

The developmen­t in the apex court came on a day when CBFC chief Prasoon Joshi, speaking to reporters at the Goa film festival, said, “We are trying to follow processes. Instead of arguments, attempts are being made to have a dialogue on the issue.” Though Alauddin Khalji’s siege of Chittor in 1303 is a historical fact, most modern historians reject the authentici­ty of Rani Padmini and the best- known story about the siege. The earliest source to mention Rani Padmavati is an epic poem, Padmavat, written by Sufi poet Makil Muhammad Jayasi in Awadhi in 1540.

Karni Sena, political group, has been protesting against the film since its shooting began. They allege that the film shows a romantic relationsh­ip between Rani Padmavati and Khalji. More protests erupted after the film’s song Ghoomar released, alleging that “it is an artistic and historic fraud to portray an incorrectl­y attired courtesan- like painted doll in the song as the very ‘ queen’ the film purports to pay obeisance to.”

Meanwhile, Haryana BJP served a show cause notice to its chief media coordinato­r Suraj Pal Amu seeking an explanatio­n over his reported remarks offering ` 10 crore bounty for beheading Padmavati director Sanjay Leela Bhansali and actor Deepika Padukone.

Tthe National Commission for Women ( NCW) has also asked the Haryana police to look into reports of the BJP leader allegedly saying, “I want to congratula­te the Meerut youth who announced a ` 5 crore bounty for beheading Deepika Padukone and Sanjay Leela Bhansali.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India