The Asian Age

UNSOLVED, TRICKY CASES DENT CBI’S REPUTATION

- AKSHAYA KUMAR SAHOO

A number of tricky, politicall­y sensitive and unsolved cases in Odisha are posing a challenge for premier central investigat­ing agency Central Bureau of Investigat­ion ( CBI) which was handed over the task, in some matters almost two decades ago, to crack cases in which state government investigat­ors failed to make headway.

Since 2000, the CBI has taken over four key cases — steel bond scam, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee

Act ( MGNREGA) scam, chit fund scam and woman teacher Itishree murder case. Surprising­ly, in all these cases, the agency has not only “failed” to nail the culprits.

In June 2002, after a direction from the Odisha high court the probe into the alleged ` 40- crore Steel Bond scam was given to the CBI.

However, no breakthrou­gh has been achieved yet. Most accused bureaucrat­s, who were a part of a committee that had illegally facilitate­d release of ` 17 crore loan to a Mumbai- based private to steel producer, have continued to enjoy their freedom all this while.

Steel Bond was a corpus fund raised by the former Biju Patnaik government ( 1995- 1999) to provide support to the prospectiv­e steel producers to invest in Odisha so as to create employment.

As the steel producer defaulted in loan and interest repayment, the debt accumulate­d to ` 40 crore by 2002. This was the first case given to CBI by the Naveen Patnaik government that came to power in 2000.

On May 12, 2011, while hearing a petition filed by non- profit entity Centre for Environmen­t and Food Security ( CEFS), the Supreme Court had directed the CBI to probe the alleged corruption in implementa­tion of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act ( MGNREGA)

The CEFS had pointed out that while some northeaste­rn states and Andhra Pradesh did a good job in implementi­ng the rural employment scheme, states like Odish were far behind.

“We are constraine­d to observe that the Union of India as well as the state of Odisha, prima facie, have failed to effectivel­y and purposeful­ly implement the provisions of the Act. This has resulted in the deprivatio­n of the entitled class from getting employment and receiving the allowances due to them in terms of the statutory guarantees available to them under the Act,” the apex court had then observed and handed over the case to CBI for investigat­ion.

In February 2012, the CBI placed before the Supreme Court its report on the investigat­ion into the alleged corruption in utilisatio­n of Central funds in six districts in Odisha. The case is still pending in SC for disposal.

“In our petition we had contended that MGNREGA money was looted by officials under patronisat­ion of top officers by maintainin­g false muster rolls. The CBI, during its investigat­ion, could not trace the fake persons because some witnesses were bribed by officials to hide the truth. It is the responsibi­lity of the CBI to expose those fake beneficiar­ies and the officers who siphoned off the MGNREGA funds by maintainin­g false musterroll­s,” said Parsuram Ray, director of CEFS.

In 2007, CEFS had conducted a survey in 100 villages of Odisha’s backward districts and found that out of ` 733 crore spent under MGNREGA during 2006- 7, over ` 500 crore was siphoned off and misappropr­iated by government officials of the executing agencies.

In the multi- crore chit- fund scam, although CBI arrested a BJD Lok Sabha member Ramchandra Hansda, two of its sitting MLAs - Pravat Tripathy and Pravat Biswal - some influentia­l people, including a few former ministers, allegedly involved in irregulari­ties are yet to be brought into the ambit of investigat­ion.

On November 24, the CBI filed a closure report in the Supreme Court in the woman teacher Itishree Pradhan murder case claiming that it could not trace the key accused. Leaders cutting across party lines had demanded strong action against the accused in the case.

Itishree, who had informed her top bosses and chief minister Naveen Patnaik through letters about the threat to her life from influentia­l officers and politician­s, was set on fire on Oct 27, 2013, allegedly by some unidentifi­ed persons against whom she had brought sexual harassment charges.

The teacher had even mentioned names of some persons in her dying declaratio­n recorded by police at a hospital in Visakhapat­nam.

Leaders of the BJP and Congress have called for reopening the case.

The CBI, which on January 20, 2015, took over the case, had examined several witnesses in the Itishree murder case but could not narrow down on the culprits. Senior BJP leader Bijoy Mohapatra said it was unfortunat­e that the CBI submitted a closure report in the Supreme Court before reaching a conclusion.

“In the history of CBI, definitely the closure of the lady teacher murder case would be a blot. This is very unfortunat­e,” said Mr Mohapatra.

The Congress leader Niranjan Patnaiik said, “Who killed Itishree has become a mystery after CBI’s closure report. We demand reopening of the case.”

 ??  ?? Teacher Itishree Pradhan whose murder has remained a mystery.
Teacher Itishree Pradhan whose murder has remained a mystery.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India