The Asian Age

The 300- cut hoax story leave both Padmavat and CBFC red in the face

-

Who planted the story in the media about the Central Board Of Film Certificat­ion ( CBFC) asking for 300 cuts in Padmavat? The story sounded far- fetched from the word go. On Tuesday morning, a story claiming 300 cuts for Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s

Padmavat created a viral sensation.

But the parties involved were far from happy. On the contrary, there was a growing feeling of dread in the

Padmavat team as it became evident again that misinforma­tion about an already- troubled project was being spread again. An unnamed source from the Padmavat team says, “The trouble with radical groups started when a story appeared in print claiming there was a dream- fantasy song sequence featuring Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh. In fact, they play adversarie­s who never come face- toface in the plot. Bhansali got so panicky that he edited out even passing shots where the two characters come face- to- face. As the film stands now, there is not even a shot where Deepika and Ranveer will be seen together. Then came the controvers­y over Deepika’s Ghoomar song with cultural and religious groups alleging that a royal queen would not dance in her own durbar. As per the CBFC’s suggestion, Bhansali deleted shots of Deepika’s Ghoomar song where her stomach was visible. In fact, the modificati­ons were made. The film was sent back and approved by the CBFC when suddenly this new damaging story of the CBFC ordering 300 cuts hit the media.” Understand­ably the CBFC was livid, as it went out of its way to ensure a liberal and fair certificat­ion for Padmavat. “We stood our ground even when the historians on the panel opposed many things in the film. And yet when a story claiming we made 300 cuts came out we were forced to wonder who is spreading these rumours and for what gains,” a source from the CBFC says angrily.

CBFC chairperso­n Prasoon Joshi categorica­lly denies the 300- cut news report. The irate chairperso­n explained, “The makers have submitted the final film with agreed five modificati­ons. These modificati­ons have tried to incorporat­e observatio­ns and suggestion­s given by the advisory panel and also in keeping with the sentiments of society. This has already been communicat­ed by the CBFC and a U/ A certificat­e has been given to the film. CBFC’s process is complete and any further news about cuts is absolutely untrue. Let’s refrain from utilising CBFC’s name unnecessar­ily.”

CBFC chairperso­n Prasoon Joshi categorica­lly denies the 300- cut news report.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India