The Asian Age

Delhi HC imposes 10K on CBI for theft case delay

◗ The trial court had also imposed a cost of 10,000 on the Director of Prosecutio­n, CBI for causing delay in adjudicati­on of the sessions case

- AGE CORRESPOND­ENT

The Delhi high court recently set aside a trial court order imposing a cost of ` 10,000 on the Director of Prosecutio­n of the CBI for causing delay in the trial of a 37- year- old theft case.

Justice Vinod Goel said that simply because a senior public prosecutor was transferre­d and another prosecutor was posted, “there was no authority for the Special Judge ( trial court) to question the transfer of senior public prosecutor” by the authoritie­s concerned in the CBI.

The court’s order came on a plea by the CBI challengin­g the trial court’s September 2017 order of passing strictures against the agency and its director of prosecutio­n.

The trial court had also imposed a cost of ` 10,000 on the Director of Prosecutio­n, CBI for causing delay in adjudicati­on of the sessions case by not posting a senior public prosecutor well in advance before the previous prosecutor was relieved.

The high court observed, “The special judge order was without any authority, jurisdicti­on or justificat­ion”.

“Having considered the facts of the present case in the aforesaid context it was not expected from the special judge either to write a letter to the Director, Central Bureau of Investigat­ion requesting him to cancel the transfer order of the senior public prosecutor ( Sr. PP) posted in his court. He was also not empowered to act beyond his jurisdicti­on i. e. subject matter of the dispute pending before him. It was not the jurisdicti­on or authority of special judge to question the transfer of Sr. PP posted in the court” it noted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India