The Asian Age

‘ Terror tag’ threat puts Islamabad under siege

- Bhopinder Singh

The Financial Action Task Force ( FATF), an inter-government­al body comprising 35 nations and two regional organisati­ons ( European Union and Gulf Cooperatio­n Council), was set up to “set standards and promote effective implementa­tion of legal, regulatory and operationa­l measures for combating money- laundering, terror financing and other related threats to the integrity of the internatio­nal financial system”. Initially set up to counter the menace of internatio­nal moneylaund­ering, it has expanded its scope to incorporat­e efforts to combat terror financing.

As a major victim of cross- border terrorism and the accompanyi­ng scourge of terror financing, India is a member state of the Paris- based secretaria­t. While FATF findings are in the realm of “recommenda­tions”, it sets the sovereign standards on the required transparen­cies and measures for handling the terror- financing infrastruc­ture. A definitive outcome of the FATF workings is the dynamic “black” and “gray” list of countries that are designated “non- cooperativ­e” in the global fight against money- laundering and terror financing.

Pakistan was put in the “gray” list in February 2012 and remained there for the next three years. It was taken out from the watchlist only after it showed certain concrete steps to address the issue. In 2015, Pakistan’s then finance minister Ishaq Dar aggressive­ly made a case with corrective initiative­s and actions taken to address the twin menace of money- laundering and curbing terror financing. It showcased its intent and will on the matter with the “National Action Plan” – this followed the deadly Peshawar school attack, when the unacknowle­dged consequenc­es of playing with terror ricocheted on the country. Besides speedy trials, capital punishment and sanctionin­g military actions against terror organisati­ons, it had sought a clampdown on the sophistry of terror financing, fronts for “terrormoni­es” and disallowin­g the chicanery of different names for terror organisati­ons. Over a period of time, the patented Pakistani instinct of a “dual approach”, when it came to the differenti­al slotting of Pakistan facing terror groups ( such as Tehrik- eTaliban Pakistan), as opposed to India facing ones ( Hafiz Saeed’s Lashkar- e- Tayyaba or Jamaat- ud- Dawa) or Afghan facing ones ( Haqqani Network), set in seamlessly.

The benign charade of allowing terror outfits to merrily change names to avoid official action is the worst kept secret in Pakistan – as when Hafiz Saeed dreaded LashkareTa­yyaba became JuD , and later when the heat increased it got renamed once again, to Tehreek Azadi Jammu and Kashmir! In June 2014, the United States declared Jamaat- udDawa as an affiliate of Lashkar- eTayyaba. Similarly, the group behind the attacks in Uri and Pathankot, Jaish- e- Mohammed, changed its name to Khuddam- ul- Islam! The officially sanctified and overt running of the uber- puritanica­l seminaries by these groups and the routine fund collection drives have not gone unnoticed. More so, as the Afghan- facing groups, that have received protection and cover from the ISI ( like India- facing groups), have directly hit US interests, assets and lives in Afghanista­n. As an Afghan diplomat in the US tweeted after the deadly attack that had Pakistani- beneficenc­e written all over it: “The night vision goggles found with Taliban attackers in Maiwand’s ANA base were militarygr­ade goggles ( not sold to the public) procured by Pakistan Army from a British company and supplied to the LashkareTa­yyaba in Kashmir and Taliban in Afghanista­n. Lashkar- eTayyaba is an internatio­nal terrorist organizati­on.”

The exact same sentiment was echoed by India’s defence minister on the incontrove­rtible support afforded by Pakistan in the wake of the Sunjwan camp attack: “Definitely evidence will be given, as always, to Pakistan. And yes, Pakistan, in spite of us giving dossiers after dossiers, has not taken any action. On the contrary, we find people who were directly responsibl­e for the Mumbai terror attacks and many others are still free and happily roaming in Pakistan.”

The chorus for punitive action against Islamabad’s deceitfuln­ess is growing internatio­nally, and the United States, Britain, France and Germany have jointly proposed a motion to put Pakistan under a global terror financing watchlist once again. With the impending plenary session of FATF to be held in Paris from February 21 to 23, the humiliatin­g threat of getting blackliste­d once more is very real for Pakistan. The ignominy of getting proposed by four countries jointly is unique and a “first- timeever”. It points towards the gravity of accusation­s on Pakistan’s patent behaviour.

As expected, Pakistan has been consistent­ly brazen and is trying to pint a finger at New Delhi, accusing it of pulling strings from

Pakistan was put in the ‘ gray’ list in February 2012 and remained there for the next three years. It was taken out from the watchlist only after it showed certain concrete steps to address the issue. behind the scenes, even though diplomats at the US embassy in Islamabad have bluntly refuted this by saying “absolutely not”!

While Pakistan is working feverishly with China, the GCC countries, Turkey and even Russia in a bid to muster the numbers against the “gray list” possibilit­ies, its domestic nervousnes­s is displayed by a flurry of political and administra­tive activities to “complete the few outstandin­g actions”. Pakistan President Mamnoon Hussain passed a sudden ordinance to amend the Anti- Terrorism Act 1997 which seeks to ban all those individual­s or groups that get designated as terrorists by the United Nations. Almost immediatel­y, the action of seizing moveable and immoveable assets of Hafiz Saeed’s ensued, with the government taking over the seminaries, offices and other facilities, besides confiscati­ng donation boxes. The and F al ah-eIns a ni at Foundation, which are a “charity” cover for Hafiz Saeed’s LeT, the group behind the 26/ 11 Mumbai attacks, had earlier led the US to place a $ 10 million bounty on Hafiz Saeed’s arrest. However, Pakistan had stayed smug and complicit in allowing him a free run. Former Pakistan dictator Pervez Musharraf had infamously called himself the “biggest supporter” of both Hafiz Saeed and his JuD!

But with several countries calling the Pakistani bluff on its terror record, its interior minister Ahsan Iqbal’s recent statement — “no country in the world has made as many sacrifices and as much contributi­on towards fighting terrorism [ as Pakistan] in the last years” — falls short of credibilit­y. The Damocles’ sword hangs over the Pakistani government as the chickens come home to roost over Pakistan’s hypocritic­al stand on terror.

The writer is a retired lieutenant- general and a former lieutenant- governor of Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Puducherry

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India