The Asian Age

As Bangladesh killings intensify, why is the world keeping quiet?

- Sudhanshu Ranjan The writer is a senior television journalist, columnist and author

The killing of secular writer- publisher Shahjahan Bachchu in Munshiganj district of Bangladesh on June 11 has revived bitter memories of the barbaric murders of secular bloggers and writers as well as members of minority communitie­s in Bangladesh. Bachchu was known for his forthright views on religion and other issues. His killing has broken the lull that persisted for some time, specially after the gruesome killings of 20 people on July 1, 2016 at the Holey Artisan Restaurant in Dhaka’s elite Gulshan area at the hands of homegrown Islamic terrorists of the Jamat- ulMujahide­en Bangladesh ( JMB) under the macabre influence of Islamic State. Of those killed, 17 were foreigners, including Japanese, Italians and one Indian. They targeted non- Muslims and identified them by asking them to read the verses of the Quran. It is shocking that while the UN high commission­er for human rights has demanded the “establishm­ent of a commission of inquiry to conduct a comprehens­ive, independen­t internatio­nal investigat­ion into allegation­s of human rights violations in Kashmir”, it is silent on the barbaric and cold- blooded murders of freethinke­rs, bloggers and writers and members of minorities elsewhere. The silence of the internatio­nal community in this regard is appalling too.

In 2012, Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina published The Unfinished Memoir, the autobiogra­phy of her father Sheikh Mujibur Rehman. In it, Mujib has recounted an incident of 1946 when Calcutta was engulfed in communal conflagrat­ions and Hindus and Muslims were killing each other. Mujib, then 26, and his photograph­er friend Yakub met Mahatma Gandhi and collected some pictures. He writes: “Among the photograph­s we had collected were some of Muslim women whose breasts had been cut off, little babies who had been beheaded, burning mosques, corpses lying in the streets and many such gruesome scenes from the riots. We wanted the Mahatma to see how his people had been guilty of such crimes, and how they had killed innocents... There can be little doubt that the photograph­s we presented to the Mahatma left a deep impression on his mind.”

Mujib’s philosophy was firmly rooted in secularism as he had witnessed the bloody communal riots and seen how his co- religionis­ts from West Pakistan tortured and killed Bengali Muslims in what was then East Pakistan. Nearly five lakh people were massacred between 1952 and 1971 in East Pakistan; according to the Awami League, this figure is 30 lakhs. Bangladesh came into existence in 1971 in the name of Bengali nationalis­m. Its citizens had not accepted the Islamic nationalis­m which had led to the creation of Pakistan. So there was a bloody protest when Muhammad Ali Jinnah declared Urdu as the national language of Pakistan, though only seven per cent of the population knew that language. East Pakistan rejected this, and demanded parity for Bengali. Students of Dhaka University led a massive protest. On February 21, 1952, many of them were killed when the police opened fire on them.

When Bangladesh framed its Constituti­on in 1972, it embraced the basic tenets of democracy, socialism, secularism and Bengali nationalis­m. Later, the junta government, led by Gen. Zia- ur Rahman, usurped power by having Sheikh Mujib and several members of his family brutally murdered in 1975. In 1977, the country introduced sweeping constituti­onal changes through the Fifth

The world community is maintainin­g an eerie silence. Global human rights bodies have spoken up, but only in the context of Rohingya Muslims, pressuring Bangladesh to permit their entry. In 1990s, a sizeable number of Rohingyas, facing persecutio­n in Myanmar, crossed over to Bangladesh and settled in Chittagong district...

Amendment, virtually destroying the soul of the Constituti­on. It substitute­d “Bengali nationalis­m” with “Bangladesh­i nationalis­m”, striking at the very raison d’être of the new nation erected on the plinth of the Bengali language and culture. The phrase “Bangladesh­i nationalis­m” has the overt hint of Islamic nationalis­m, and this became evident as secularism was replaced with “absolute trust and faith in Almighty Allah”. In 1988, Islam was declared the state religion.

However, in 2010, the Bangladesh Supreme Court ordered the restoratio­n of secularism as a basic tenet of the Constituti­on. The Sheikh Hasina government brought in the 15th Amendment in 2011 for this, but she did not change Islam as the state religion. In fact, the amendment reinforced it by inserting a new sentence above the preamble: “Param karunamoy name shuru korilam” ( In the name of the all compassion­ate, we begin). It is atravesty that Sheikh Hasina, Mujib’s daughter, is not following in the footsteps of her father as firmly as she is expected to.

The world community is maintainin­g an eerie silence. Global human rights bodies have spoken up, but only in the context of Rohingya Muslims, pressuring Bangladesh to permit their entry. In 1990s, a sizeable number of Rohingyas, facing persecutio­n in Myanmar, crossed over to Bangladesh and settled in Chittagong district and the Cox’s Bazar region. The irony is that many Islamist militants are from those Rohingyas who fled to escape persecutio­n. They were indoctrina­ted by the Jamat- e- Islami and it is this class of terrorists which is totally opposed to liberal values and politics. It’s not that Sheikh Hasina has not done anything, but it is far from being adequate. She got Canadian- born mastermind Tamim Chaudhary and six of his trusted lieutenant­s eliminated. He was sent to Bangladesh by the islamic State with the aim of killing non- believers, as he himself articulate­d in a rare interview, “It is not the methodolog­y of the Khilafat soldiers to send mere threats to enemies of Allah. Rather, we let our actions do the talking. Our soldiers are sharpening their knives to slaughter the atheists and apostates of the region.”

For these obscuranti­sts, anyone not believing in Allah is a heretic. Thus they target not only Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, etc, but also Muslims who are atheists. The government sulks after each incident and invariably blames the victim for hurting the religious sentiments of the people. It is not at all serious about protecting Hindus. Irrepressi­ble blogger Arif Jebtik, who faces death threats for his fearless writings, had explained the Hasina government’s stand on Hindus to an Indian newspaper thus: “Thaakley vote paabo, gele jomi paabo.”( If Hindus stay, we shall get their votes, and if they leave, we shall get their land.)

When will the world community wake up? Article 29 of the Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights reads: “Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full developmen­t of his personalit­y is possible.” The Universal Declaratio­n had to be adopted as the United Nations Charter has utterly failed to protect human rights.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India