The Asian Age

‘ Make public remission orders of life convicts’

Says CIC on Rajiv Gandhi assassin’s petition

- AGE CORRESPOND­ENT with agency inputs

The orders granting or denying remission to life term convicts post 2,000 should be put on the Union home ministry website, the Central Informatio­n Commission has said on a petition by a Rajiv Gandhi assassinat­ion convict. The CIC, the top appellate authority in the matters pertaining to the Right to Informatio­n Act, held that it is in public interest that people get to know as to why a convict is being released.

Hearing the petition filed by A. G. Perarivala­n, a convict in the former Prime Minister’s assassinat­ion case, Informatio­n Commission­er Yashovardh­an Azad directed the home ministry public informatio­n commission­er to place all orders granting or denying remission to life convicts from the year 2000 onwards on the website of the MHA.

In addition to the copy of orders, Perarivala­n, through his RTI applicatio­n, had also sought to know if any rules have been framed by the Centre on granting remission as directed by the Supreme Court. He had also sought the copies of communicat­ion issued by the Centre to the state government­s refraining them from granting remission.

The home ministry did not give a clear response to Perarivala­n’s queries, stating the matter was “sub- judice”. It, however, said 20 death sentences have been commuted to life terms by the President between 2010 and 2015.

Perarivala­n, whose applicatio­n for remission of sentence was earlier rejected by the Centre, approached the Commission challengin­g the reply. In his order, Azad noted, “The PIO failed to apply his mind and sought a blanket refuge under the guise of the matter being subjudice. It is well settled that that mere pendency of a matter before a Court of Law does not render all informatio­n espousing the matter as exempted under the RTI Act,” Terming the reply as “bad in law”, Azad said there was no specific direction from the Supreme Court not to disclose such informatio­n. He said all that Perarivala­n sought to know was the documented policy and rules governing the remission of convicts in light of a judicial pronouncem­ent by the Supreme Court in a case dealing with the remission of the sentence of Rajiv Gandhi assassinat­ion convicts by the Tamil Nadu government.

“The Commission hastens to clarify that the right of appellant to know the rules governing him has no impact on any judicial verdict. Rather, it is in larger public interest that such rules, if in existence, may be widely circulated,” he said.

On the demand of making public remission orders issued by the Centre for convicts across India, Azad noted the public informatio­n officer has not taken a position in this regard.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India