NYT anonymous Op- Ed had ‘ risks’

New York, Sept. 7: The coup of publishing a column by an anonymous Trump administration official bashing the boss could backfire on The New York Times if the author is unmasked and turns out to be a littleknown person, or if the newspaper’s own reporters solve the puzzle.

Within hours of the essay appearing on the paper’s website, the mystery of the writer’s identity began to rival the Watergate- era hunt for “Deep Throat” in Washington, and a parade of Trump team members issued statements on Thursday saying, in effect, “it’s not me.”

The Times’ only clue was calling the author a “senior administration official.” James Dao, the newspaper’s op- ed editor, said in the Times’ daily podcast that while an intermediary brought him together with the author, he conducted a background check and spoke to the person to the point that he was “totally confident” in the identity.

How large the pool of “senior administration officials” is in Washington is a matter of interpretation.

It’s a term used loosely around the White House. Press offices often release statements or offer background briefings and ask that the information be attributed to a senior administration official.

The Partnership for Public Services tracks approximately 700 senior positions in government, ones that require Senate confirmation. Paul Light, a New York University professor and expert on the federal bureaucracy, said about 50 people could have legitimately written the column — probably someone in a political position appointed by President Donald Trump.

He suspects the author is in either a Cabinet- level or deputy secretary position who frequently visits the White House or someone who works in the maze of offices in the West Wing.