The Asian Age

SC to Parliament: Enact law to bar criminal netas

‘ Parties must publicise candidates’ records’

- J. VENKATESAN

While criminalis­ation in politics is a bitter manifest truth, that is a ‘ termite to the citadel of democracy’, the court can’t make the law — Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to direct the Election Commission to debar candidates with a serious criminal background from contesting elections and instead asked Parliament to enact suitable legislatio­n to decriminal­ise the country’s polity.

A five- judge Constituti­on Bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Rohinton Nariman, A. M. Kanwilkar, D. Y. Chandrachu­d and Indu Malhotra, however, directed that the criminal antecedent­s of all candidates seeking to contest elections must be made public through wide publicity in the media.

Writing the judgment disposing of the petitions filed by NGO Public Interest Foundation and others, the CJI said it would be mandatory for political parties fielding chargeshee­ted persons and contesting candidates to make known to the public their criminal background at least three times after the filing of nomination­s so that voters would have an informed choice before voting.

The CJI said on a perusal of the relevant articles in the Constituti­on, it was clear

as crystal that disqualifi­cation for being chosen as a member of either House of Parliament and similarly disqualifi­cation for being chosen or being a

member of the Legislativ­e Assembly or Legislativ­e Council of a state, the law had to be made by Parliament. While criminalis­ation in politics is a bitter manifest truth, that is a “termite to the citadel of democracy”, the court cannot make the law.

The court said: “In a multi- party democracy, where members are elected on party lines and are subject to party discipline, we recommend to Parliament to bring out a strong law whereby it is mandatory for political parties to revoke the membership of persons against whom charges are framed in heinous and grievous offences, and not set up such persons in elections, both for Parliament and the state Assemblies. This, in our attentive and plausible view, would go a long way in achieving decriminal­isation of politics and usher in an era of immaculate, spotless, unsullied and virtuous constituti­onal democracy.”

The bench said substantia­l efforts have to be undertaken to cleanse the polluted stream of politics by prohibitin­g people with criminal antecedent­s so that they do not even conceive of the idea of entering politics. “We are sure, the lawmaking wing of the democracy of this country will take it upon itself to cure the malignancy. We say so as such a malignancy is not incurable. It only depends upon the time and stage when one starts treating it; the sooner the better, before it becomes fatal to democracy. Thus, we part, leaving the future exercise to the wisdom of Parliament”, the bench added.

In a series of other directions, the bench said that each contesting candidate shall fill up the nomination form which must contain in bold letters the criminal cases pending against the candidate; if a candidate is contesting an election on the ticket of a particular party, he/ she is required to inform the party about the criminal cases pending against him/ her. The concerned political party shall be obligated to put up on its website the aforesaid informatio­n pertaining to candidates having criminal antecedent­s. The candidate and the concerned party shall issue a declaratio­n in widely- circulated newspapers in the locality about the antecedent­s of the candidate and also give wide publicity in the electronic media.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India