ABC boss quits over political interference row
◗ Mr Milne unsuccessfully pressed for the sacking of two senior reporters over coverage that did not please his friend, Malcolm
Sydney, Sept. 27: Australia’s much- loved public broadcaster scrambled to safeguard its hard- won reputation for impartiality Thursday, forcing out a chairman accused of intervening in news coverage to please the government.
Top executive Justin Milne told the ABC he would step down, after the institution’s board held crisis talks in Sydney and the government announced an inquiry into his actions.
According to leaked emails, Mr Milne unsuccessfully pressed for the sacking of two senior reporters over coverage that did not please his friend, Malcolm Turnbull, then the prime minister of the current centre- right government.
Mr Milne on Thursday told the ABC the crisis had been a “firestorm” and said he “wanted to provide a release valve”.
The almost century- old Australian Broadcasting Corporation is incredibly popular Down Under, with polls showing it is not just the most trusted news organisation in the country, but also seen as a national treasure.
ABC journalists demanded Milne go on when the revelations became public on Wednesday. Initially the Liberal Party- led government stopped short of publicly forcing that move, announcing that its Department of Communications would conduct an inquiry “to establish the facts in these matters”.
After appearing to be on the fence, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the ABC and Milne had “made the right call” in changing leadership.
“Time for the ABC to resume normal transmission, both independently and without bias. That is what Australia’s taxpayers pay for and deserve,” he said. Acting Centre- left Opposition leader Tanya Plibersek demanded an independent investigation into what happened.
“The ABC is not the propaganda arm of the Liberal party of Australia. It is our national broadcaster. Australians love their ABC. They are, rightly, very protective of its integrity and independence.” Milne did not directly address the allegations in a written statement, but insisted the board had worked to ensure the independence, interests and continued funding of the organisation.