The Asian Age

Aircel- Maxis case: CBI gets 7 weeks to obtain sanction

Agency requires sanction to prosecute Chidambara­m, Karti & 10 others

- AGE CORRESPOND­ENT

◗ The court pulled up the CBI for filing the charge sheet without proper sanction and said that the court may take appropriat­e action in the next hearing if the required documents are not filed

A Delhi court on Monday granted seven weeks to the CBI to obtain sanction to prosecute former Union minister P. Chidambara­m and other serving or former public servants in the Aircel- Maxis deal case.

The court pulled up the agency for filing the charge sheet without proper sanction and told the CBI that if the required documents are not filed by November 26, the next day of hearing, the court may take appropriat­e action.

Special judge O. P. Saini said: “You ( CBI) should not have filed the charge sheet. It is only increasing the pendency of the court. A lot of time of the court has been wasted due to this.”

The investigat­ing agency

had on July 19 filed a charge sheet against the Congress leader, his son Karti, 10 individual­s including public servants and six companies as accused in the case.

The court allowed the CBI’s request for grant of some time after senior advocate Sonia Mathur, representi­ng the agency, informed the judge that sanctions are awaited.

The judge said: “If the sanction is not received, appropriat­e actions will be taken.” Ms Mathur said, “Granting of sanction is under active considerat­ion of the government.”

Mr Chidambara­m’s name is among the persons against whom sanction for prosecutio­n from authoritie­s concerned was awaited. The court also adjourned a money laundering case, which is an off- shoot of the Aircel- Maxis deal case, against Karti and others, after Ms Mathur and lawyers N. K. Matta and Nitesh Rana requested an adjournmen­t on behalf of the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e ( ED).

The ED had on July 13 filed a charge sheet against Karti and others for the alleged offence of money laundering. However, the former Union minister was not arrayed as an accused in the case. In the case filed by CBI, Ms Mathur told the court that the agency was expecting sanctions for prosecutio­n from authoritie­s concerned in about four weeks.

The counsel told the court that there were serving public servants and some retired ones against whom the sanctions would be needed before proceeding with their prosecutio­n in the case. The CBI had filed the charge sheet for the alleged offences of criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code ( IPC), public servant taking illegal gratificat­ion, punishment for abetting this offence and public servant committing criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act. If convicted, the offences entail a maximum punishment of seven years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India