HC reserves verdict in National Herald case
Parties asked to submit written plea in 3 days
The Delhi high court on Monday reserved verdict on a plea by National Herald publisher AJL challenging a single judge direction to vacate the premises here, arguing that transfer of shares to YI, in which Congress chief Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi are shareholders, won’t make them the building’s owners.
A bench of chief justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V. K. Rao reserved its decision after Associated Journals Ltd concluded its arguments. The court also asked AJL and the Centre’s lawyers to file their written submissions in three days.
During the more- thananhour hearing, AJL, represented by senior advocate Abhishek M. Singhvi, reiterated the argument that transfer of the company’s majority shares to Young India ( YI) would not make Gandhis the owners of the Herald building here.
Mr Singhvi also contended that the Centre never raised the issue of lack of printing activity at the Herald building prior to June 2018, by when publishing of some of its online editions had already commenced.
The Centre, represented by solicitor general Tushar Mehta, had earlier argued that in the manner the shares were transferred, the court needs to “pierce the corporate veil” of AJL to see who owns the premises — Herald House — leased to it for running a printing press.
The government had contended that the land in question was allocated to AJL on lease for printing press and this “dominant purpose” was stopped several years ago.
AJL has appealed against the single judge’s December 21, 2018 order that directed it to vacate the premises at ITO within two weeks, after which eviction proceedings under the Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, would be initiated.
◗ AJL has appealed against the single judge’s December 21, 2018 order that directed it to vacate the premises at ITO within two weeks after which eviction proceedings would be initiated