‘Change in attitude needed for speedy disposal of suits’
There is an imminent need for change in attitude and will for expeditious disposal of commercial suits, the Delhi high court observed.
The observation came while the Delhi HC was passing a slew of directions so that lawyers and litigants make efforts to expedite disposal of suits. The court was deciding an application seeking permission to file certain additional documents in a commercial suit.
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said that though the legislature, by enacting the Commercial Courts Act, intended expeditious disposal of suits, in majority of commercial suits applications like delayed filing of documents or condonation of delay are being filed.
The court said these applications were envisaged by the Commercial Courts Act to be an exception in such cases rather than the norm.
The judge said the effort to expedite the case, as endeavoured by the act, cannot be only by the courts but must be by all the stakeholders, that is, litigants and counsel.
It said that in the beginning itself, lawyers should prepare an entire blue print of their case or defence, including the witnesses to be examined, by studying the law and judgments
◗ The court noted cer- tain practices, such as lack of strategy, lack of understanding of their own claim or defence, etc. which lead to unnecessary delay in disposal of commercial suits
on the subject and controversy.
The court noted certain practices, such as lack of strategy, lack of understanding of their own claim or defence, etc. which lead to unnecessary delay in disposal of commercial suits.
It also dealt with the practice of seeking time to file reply to interim applications and said that the opposite party or the advocate, out of habit, asks for time even when there is no need for a reply.
“Moreover, the law on various aspects, which come up for consideration
◗ It also dealt with the practice of seeking time to file reply to interim applications and said that the opposite party or the advocate asks for time even when there is no need for a reply
in such interim applications, is by and large settled and any counsel worth his salt knows the outcome of such applications.
“In such situations, no time should be permitted to be wasted on such applications and if the counsel knows that the application, even after reply and arguments would be allowed, should consent thereto,” the court said.
“Else, the Commercial Courts Act, insofar as aimed at expediting disposal, will remain a piece of legislation only on paper,” it added.