The Asian Age

Indian Matchmakin­g and the pursuit of happiness

- Suparna Sharma

Many a desi, traditiona­l knickers have been twisting, turning and wedging uncomforta­bly into entitled Bharatiya bums since Indian Matchmakin­g, an eight-part reality show, dropped on Netflix. The reason is simply this: the shaadi market, which was till now thought to be exclusivel­y under the command and control of boys log and their stern, judgy mummyjis and daddyjis, suddenly seems to have a new claimant — a certain type of women they hate with a passion, i.e. girls in dresses who are independen­t, successful, single. Women who love themselves, know their mind, and the kind of partner they seek.

Many of these girls on Indian Matchmakin­g have already tried dating-shating to find a mate, and are now seeking the profession­al services of a matchmaker to help them browse through and shop for a suitable boy.

But, while most Indian boys go to see girls with their mummyjis and daddyjis in tow, these girls are driving solo in their cars to check out boys. They meet the boys in restaurant­s were they drink, chat, laugh, order non-veg food and, after all that, reject the boys. Hawhai!

The world of matrimonia­l alliances is in wide-eyed shock. Jaws have dropped and words are not forming. Just froth. Because seeing these girls prance about expressing their opinion on the kind of men they seek is conjuring a scary scenario in the minds of mummyjis cradling their precious boys — that their saputs may not be special after all, and may well be rejected.

And in all this, Aparna, a 34-year-old Sindhi girl from Houston, Texas, has become the main object of loathing.

Some racy, lacy, millennial knickers are also in a twist over the whole transactio­nal, loveless nature of desi matchmakin­g. Everytime they hear the words “girls have to compromise... adjust” uttered on the show, which is often, a raging tweet or Facebook post follows.

This hate is directed especially towards Preeti, the rich mummyji of 25-yearold Akshay. He has joined his daddyji’s business and wants a girl just like mummy, but adds that he must also feel attracted to her. If you paused at this sentence, sensing a deep issue, scream “Oedipus”.

Preetiji’s list of the qualities her prospectiv­e bahu must possess is long and baffling — “flexible, compatible, smart, cultured, but not too beautiful”. Above all, she must smilingly accept that it’s “my house, my rules”.

Enter the star of the show — Sima Taparia, “Mumbai’s top matchmaker”, who also operates in Bangkok, Hong Kong and America.

Simaji is a miracle worker, a Santa Claus of matrimony whose phone and folders are full of photos and bio-datas of eligible boys and girls in search for a mate.

Give her the most daunting, strangest wish-list and, voila, she will produce a match.

Simaji believes in destiny but leaves nothing to chance. She meets with the boys and girls at their home and chats with their families to figure out their lifestyle, nature, likes, dislikes.

She also uses the services of a face reader, an astrologer, a panditji who matches Kundalis. And sometimes, when she senses a knot, confusion, she sends her clients to a life coach.

Practical, empathetic, clear-headed, and a straight shooter, Simaji’s only rule for all her clients is that they must pursue only one prospect at a time.

The world that believes in marriage is split between those who pursue love and believe in finding, trying out their soulmate themselves, and those who seek and follow the help, advice and approval of their parents, elders.

Indian Matchmakin­g is devoted to the latter. Within the convention­al, rigid setting and rules of arranged marriages, the show manages to stay focused on boys and girls who are in search of happiness, but with the firm belief that their happiness rests on the happiness of their family.

So there is a lot that the series doesn’t show. Sex, or talk of sex, of course, for obvious reasons. Though at one point, when a panditji says that boys and girls also seek compatibil­ity in bed, Simaji looks as if a dead rat has dropped from the ceiling into her lap. The topic is never broached again.

The series also doesn’t show the ugly side of Indian shaadis, of give and take, dowry, demands.

If Indian Matchmakin­g had only been about marriages that are finalised around a dining table by elders sitting with folded hands and judging, figuring out everything apart from how the boy and girl will fare in bed, it would have passed without a ripple, like the long matrimonia­l ads seeking fair complexion­ed girls do, every weekend. But because it also follows girls sitting across restaurant tables, sipping cocktails and wondering, even as they chat smilingly with the boys, when they can leave, it’s causing much discomfort. And then there’s Aparna, who has hassled not just Simaji, but a large part of the world.

A busy, motivated lawyer who loves traveling, Aparna is looking for a man who will “fit into" her life. Very clear about what she wants, she doesn’t like to waste time and prefers short, 55-minute dates.

A Sindhi would be great, she says, and doesn't care

The Indian matrimonia­l market is huge. And it’s been dominated by boys and boys’ side, like, forever. What these girls are claiming is just a tiny sliver of that market... about a sense of humour nor does she want an overtly romantic guy.

“There is nothing about me that I need to change or evolve,” she says, and has in the past rejected a boy because he didn't know that Bolivia has salt flats.

She hates comedy, beaches and doesn't want children at her wedding. But the man she marries must have passions outside of work, good education, and should not be keen on either football or long, relaxing vacations.

Aparna, who doesn’t cook but has 50 pairs of shoes, is the ultimate nightmare of the matrimonia­l market and mummyjis.

She is also, sometimes, rude. After meeting a guy suggested by Simaji, a perfectly decent gentlemen who seemed to be making an effort to connect with her, the word “loser” gets uttered.

The anger against her is understand­able. But what is baffling is the free pass that has been given to Preetiji and certain men on the show who are decidedly creepy.

Like this one guy, Vinay, who disappears on this lovely girl, Nadia, after going out on seven dates. Or sulky Guru who arrives in a crumpled T-shirt and rejects Nadia because she drinks. Or the Delhi matchmaker Gita who can’t stop talking about how it’s women’s duty to sacrifice for the man.

The Indian matrimonia­l market is huge. And it’s been dominated by boys and boys’ side, like, forever. What these girls are claiming is just a tiny sliver of that market, and they are following the exact same rules set and accepted for the boys. So why the rage?

Or, perhaps, thus, the rage.

Preetiji, who epitomises all that is wrong with the rather clinical arranged marriage set-up, one that has worked for generation­s, inadverten­tly puts it all in perspectiv­e with one stray remark.

In Udaipur to check out a girl her son seems to finally like, Preetiji asks her, "What are you looking for in a life partner?"

“Someone I can share my feelings with,” replies the shy girl, with a tentative smile.

“Oh!” remarks Preeti. And then adds, without smiling, “Still looking.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India