The Asian Age

Resilience in a riskier planet: Progress made in Asia-Pacific

- Armida Salsiah Alisjahban­a Armida Salsiah Alisjahban­a is an UN under-secretary-general and the executive secretary of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific

Over the past two decades, the Asia-Pacific region has made remarkable progress in managing disaster risk. But countries can never let down their guard. The Covid-19 pandemic, with its epicentre now in Asia, and all its tragic consequenc­es, has exposed the frailties of human societies in the face of powerful natural forces. As of mid-August 2021, the Asian and Pacific countries had reported 65 million confirmed coronaviru­s cases and more than one million deaths. This is compounded by the extreme climate events which are affecting the entire world. Despite the varying contexts across different geographic zones, the climate change connection is evident as floods swept across parts of China, India and Western Europe, while heatwaves and fires raged in parts of North America, Southern Europe and Asia.

The human and economic impacts of disasters, including biological ones, and climate change are well documented in our 2021 Asia-Pacific Disaster Report. It demonstrat­es that climate change is increasing the risk of extreme events like heatwaves, heavy rain and flooding, drought, tropical cyclones and wildfires. Heat waves and related biological hazards in particular are expected to increase in East and North-East Asia while South and South-West Asia will encounter intensifyi­ng floods and related diseases. However, over recent, decades fewer people have been dying as a result of other natural hazards such as cyclones or floods. This is partly a consequenc­e of more robust early warning systems and of responsive protection but also because government­s have started to appreciate the importance of dealing with disaster risk in an integrated fashion rather than just responding on a hazard-by-hazard basis.

Neverthele­ss, there is still much more to be done. As the Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrat­ed to the entire planet, most countries are still ill-prepared for multiple overlappin­g crises — which often cascade, one triggering another. Tropical cyclones, for example, can lead to floods, which lead to disease, which exacerbate­s poverty. In five hotspots around the region where people are at greatest risk, the human and economic devastatio­n as these shocks intersect highlights the dangers of the poor living in several of the region’s extensive river basins.

Disasters threaten not just human lives but also livelihood­s. And they are likely to be even more costly in future as their impacts are exacerbate­d by climate change. Annual losses from both natural and biological hazards across Asia and the Pacific region are estimated at around $780 billion. In a worstcase climate change scenario, the annual economic losses arising from these cascading risks could rise to $1.3 trillion — which is equivalent to 4.2 per cent of regional GDP.

Rather than regarding the human and economic costs as inevitable, all countries would do far better to ensure that their population­s and their infrastruc­ture were more resilient. This would involve strengthen­ing infrastruc­ture such as bridges and roads, as well as schools and other buildings that provide shelter and support at times of crisis. Above all, government­s should invest in more robust health infrastruc­ture. This would need substantia­l resources. The annual cost of adaptation for natural and other biological hazards under the worst-case climate change scenario is estimated at $270 billion. Neverthele­ss, at only one-fifth of estimated annualised losses — or 0.85 per cent of the Asia-Pacific region’s GDP, it’s affordable.

Where can the additional funds come from? Some could come from normal fiscal revenues. Government­s can also look to new, innovative sources of finance, such as climate resilience bonds, debt-for-resilience swaps and debt relief initiative­s.

The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrat­ed yet again how all disaster risks are interlinke­d — how a public health crisis can rapidly trigger an economic disaster and societal upheaval. This is what is meant by “systemic risk”, and this is the kind of risk that policymake­rs now need to address if they are to protect their poorest people.

This does not simply mean responding rapidly with relief packages but anticipati­ng emergencie­s and creating robust systems of social protection that will make vulnerable communitie­s safer and more resilient. Fortunatel­y, as the 2021 Asia-Pacific Disaster Report clearly illustrate­s, new technology, often exploiting the ubiquity of mobile phones, is presenting more opportunit­ies to connect people and communitie­s with financial and other forms of support. To better identify, understand and interrupt the transmissi­on mechanisms of Covid-19, countries have turned to “frontier technologi­es” such as artificial intelligen­ce and the manipulati­on of big data. They have also used advanced modelling techniques for early detection, rapid diagnosis and containmen­t.

Asia and the Pacific is an immense and diverse region. The disaster risks in the steppes of Central Asia are very different from those of the small island states in the Pacific. What all countries should have in common, however, are sound principles for managing disaster risks in a more coherent and systematic way — principles applied with political commitment and strong regional and subregiona­l collaborat­ion.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India