The Asian Age

YOU CAN MAKE ANYTHING UP ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY...

- Philip Hensher By arrangemen­t with the Spectator

There are quite a few things that Tina Brown doesn’t know: what “jejune” means; when Louis XIV came to the throne; what the passive voice in prose is (not “recollecti­ons may vary”); what members of the aristocrac­y are called (Lady Romsey becomes Lady Penelope Romsey) or what members of the royal family are called (the “Dowager Duchess of Gloucester­shire” puts in an appearance). Another thing she doesn’t know (which she shares with other authors of works in this obscenely overstuffe­d genre) is what’s been going on between members of the royal family in the period between the death of Diana, Princess of Wales and the death of the Duke of Edinburgh — which we aren’t likely to find out until the real private papers and emails become available to some future Jane Ridley. The title of this book is a bit of a swiz.

Until then, in the accounts of writers with various degrees of access, intelligen­ce and perception, all we have is tittletatt­le, and the occasional flash of authentic feeling expressed in public. Some of the gossip in The Palace Papers, like all books of this sort, is grossly implausibl­e. There is a claim of something very private that the future Duchess of Cornwall said to the Prince of Wales the first time they went to bed together, which is dutifully footnoted to a volume by the American journalist Kitty Kelley. A moment’s thought will show how unlikely it is that either person would have shared this with anyone without it having the most disastrous effect on their relationsh­ip. But the line is too good to be dropped. At this point one starts to think about volumes of royal muckraking that you can make up anything and have a fair chance of it being repeated. If I said in this review that I happened to know that all the Prince of Wales’s siblings were in the habit of referring to him among themselves as “Blodwen”, I dare say it would soon find its way into print as a matter of fact.

I’ve had my encounter with the species. There was a moment in the 1990s when I was lurching through Soho after a protracted lunch and came across three policemen outside an advertisin­g agency. “What’s going on?” I asked. The Queen was coming, I was told. Despite my scepticism, I thought I would wait around, and lit a cigarette. Almost at once a black limousine drew up and a policeman leapt forward, opened the door and out she popped. My admiration for Her Majesty is unlimited, and I burst into applause. What she was doing visiting an advertisin­g agency in Soho I never discovered. But she slowed very slightly and gave me a look at once beady and slightly alarmed. And then she was in, shaking the hands of creatives.

The point, I guess, is that the most glancing encounter with any of even the top 30 in line to the succession or their spouses is likely to make an impression — in the street, at the theatre, at a concert or at a party. They still occupy a large place in our national imaginatio­n. Their utterances, when they make them, are pored over for implicatio­ns; their choices are analysed — and probably invented, too. Among many things Brown mentions in her breathless chronicle as evidence of their conviction­s are the placement of family photograph­s and the role of jewellery and hats. The suggestion that the Queen’s choice of brooch to wear for Donald Trump’s state visit somehow indicated her disapprova­l of him shows just how fevered such speculatio­n can get.

This is yet another book about the past 25 years in the royal family, including the Andrew debacle, the Prince of Wales’s life since he remarried, and William and Catherine Cambridge (she knew instantly that she was talking to a hostile stranger when a tabloid investigat­ive reporter phoned her and asked “Is that Kate Middleton?”). The Cambridges are dignified, charming, very private and wellbehave­d, and Catherine’s unheralded visit to Clapham Common to lay flowers for Sarah Everard was much appreciate­d locally.

The Sussexes, on the other hand, are richly comic characters, and the ludicrous series of disasters, petulance, pompous edicts and self-promotion without thinking things through make the last third of the book unintentio­nally amusing. High points include Meghan treating the Queen’s dresser, Angela Kelly, like “a contract stylist at NBC” when she arrived bearing the Queen’s choice of wedding tiara, and Meghan’s terrifying­ly well-choreograp­hed social ascent without, apparently, ever getting to know anyone. “How do you know them?” a family friend asked George and Amal Clooney at the wedding. “We don’t,” they said (according to Rachel Johnson). I couldn’t find any original discoverie­s here or compelling new witnesses, and “Outside the House of Windsor” might have been a more accurate subtitle.

 ?? ?? THE PALACE PAPERS: INSIDE THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR — THE TRUTH AND THE TURMOIL
By TINA BROWN Century pp. 320, £20
THE PALACE PAPERS: INSIDE THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR — THE TRUTH AND THE TURMOIL By TINA BROWN Century pp. 320, £20
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India