The Asian Age

Challenge for India, world after Iran strikes at Israel

- K.C. Singh The writer is a former secretary in the external affairs ministry. He tweets at @ambkcsingh.

The latest Israel-Iran standoff has served Mr Netanyahu’s primary purpose of distractin­g attention from the Israeli killing of civilians in Gaza, with the Rafah operation imminent. It also reduces the pressure on him to quit and face fresh elections.

Tensions had been mushroomin­g across the entire West Asian region ever since the October 7 lethal attack by Hamas on Israeli settlement­s and troops around Gaza, in which they also seized several hostages, many of whom still remain in captivity. Global opinion has gradually swung behind the Palestinia­ns after Israel’s “scorched earth” approach as it tried to wipe out Hamas. Israel showed limited concern for civilian casualties as hospitals, churches and mosques were bombed, alleging they were atop an undergroun­d labyrinth of hundreds of miles of tunnels. Hamas fighters, its leadership and hostages were supposedly in that maze.

One episode of ceasefire provided some respite to civilians, hounded from one temporary shelter to another, facing disease and starvation. US President Joe Biden, facing criticism at home for pandering to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has only partially and infrequent­ly succeeded in coaxing Israel to moderate its brutal military campaign. In Israel, public demonstrat­ions had reignited over the hostages not being rescued. The Israelis were being just held back from invading Rafah, the last surviving big city in Gaza.

On April 1, Israel bombed the Iranian diplomatic complex in Damascus, killing seven Iranian Revolution­ary Guard Corps personnel. More significan­tly, among them were three senior commanders overseeing liaison with Iranian allies like Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Bashar al-Assad government in Damascus. After the killing of Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a celebrated Iranian commander of the Quds Force, by the US, this was a strategic win for Israel. But it came at the cost of riling Iran and breaching internatio­nally recognised sanctity of diplomatic missions. The debate then shifted to how and when Iran would retaliate. There were no takers for Iran quietly absorbing the loss.

The Iranian retaliatio­n came on the night of April 1314, with over 300 ballistic and cruise missiles, including drones, fired at an Israeli air base in Israel’s southern desert. The Israeli anti-missile defence, called the Iron Dome, and its Air Force combined with similar defence offered by US naval vessels and aircraft took out all but seven missiles. Israel claimed that the damage was minimal, with only one Arab girl hit by shrapnel. The reaction of G-7 countries, which went into a huddle, was sharper over the Iranian retaliatio­n than the initial Israeli provocatio­n.

The Indian government’s positionin­g is interestin­g. The Damascus Iranian embassy bombing was not condemned, but mere distress expressed over escalating tension and breach of internatio­nal norms. This was akin to India seeking observance of internatio­nal humanitari­an law and not vociferous­ly condemning the merciless Israeli targeting of civilians in Gaza.

More disturbing, though hardly surprising, is India’s bilateral labour transfer agreement, finalised during last year’s India trip of Israeli foreign minister Eli Cohen. In the past Israel employed nearly 80,000 Palestinia­ns from the West Bank, and 17,000 from Gaza. After the attack on October 7, Israel plans to substitute them with workers from China, Sri Lanka and India. Bangladesh is skipped, perhaps due to the workers’ religion. From India, Israel seeks 42,000 workers for the constructi­on industry and another 8,000 as health workers. This accord invited attention due to an Indian travel advisory about the danger now of travel to Israel, only days after dispatchin­g the latest batch of workers. This is a typical case of contradict­ory policies followed by different arms of the government.

Its implicatio­ns are in fact wider than simply the security of the workers. It has been obvious since the BJPled government assumed office in 2014 that Israel has special lure for it. When Lal Krishna Advani began his foreign travel as home minister with Israel, I conveyed informally to his close friend that he needed to moderate his hawkish anti-Muslim image. A trip to Israel did not achieve that.

While Israel has had broad support across India, for Prime Minister Narendra Modi it is more than friendship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Despite the current Israeli coalition government having rabidly bigoted ministers from the extreme right fringe, the Indian government appears to be unconcerne­d about close engagement. Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich also oversees the occupied West Bank, despite his known support for expanding settlement­s.

National security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, convicted in 2007 on terrorism charges, strongly advocated “free fire” authority to security forces in dealing with Palestinia­ns. The suspected transfer to Indian agencies of Pegasus, an invasive phonetappi­ng virus, underscore­s the malignant dimension of India-Israel bonhomie.

Considerin­g the eight million-plus Indian diaspora in the Arab Gulf countries, the policy of Indian labour depriving Palestinia­ns of their jobs is myopic. The rush to show large recruitmen­t for jobs abroad, as the Lok Sabha election approaches, hardly answers the Opposition’s charge of high unemployme­nt. The assumption is that because the ruling families of the UAE and Saudi Arabia want to engage Israel, they will block any backlash. The six Gulf Coordinati­on Council members met last week in Doha to approve a “Vision for Regional Security”, which accepts Israel’s legitimate place in a regional security order. But they also could not ignore the Palestinia­n question. Popular resentment in the GCC nations can lead to quiet scaling back of Indian recruitmen­t by individual entities.

External affairs minister S. Jaishankar has been balancing India’s relations with Iran and Israel. But the language of official statements betrays differenti­al empathy for Israel. This will become more difficult if Israel retaliates against Iran directly. Until now, Israel has used cyber sabotage, assassinat­ion of Iranian nuclear scientists, etc. But a direct attack can ratchet up tension multi-fold.

The latest Israel-Iran standoff has served Mr Netanyahu’s primary purpose of distractin­g attention from the Israeli killing of civilians in Gaza, especially with the Rafah operation imminent. It also reduces the pressure on him to quit and face fresh elections. The Iranian attack seemed to be carefully calibrated to minimise damage. It came with forewarnin­gs, targeted an isolated airbase and the US played along to negate it. It is a bit like the Pakistani retaliatio­n to Balakot in 2019 when their fighter jets hit an uninhabite­d part of an Indian military facility. The aim in both cases being to satisfy public opinion without causing excessive damage, thereby avoiding counter-reaction.

If so, any further conflagrat­ion may be avoided. If, however, Israel uses the opportunit­y to decapitate Iran’s strategic nuclear infrastruc­ture, then the next Iranian attack would be modulated to hurt. Iran would have gauged weaknesses in the Israeli defensive system after analysing the last attack. The world is keeping its fingers crossed.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India