The Free Press Journal

No criminal intent, only careless

Govt representa­tive, Dr BK Kadam, who was also part of the authorisat­ion committee, has only been found careless in scrutinisi­ng the documents

- RAJIV SHARMA Mumbai

Initial findings of the committee that is going into the authorisat­ion process followed at Hiranandan­i Hospital has revealed that the government representa­tive is not guilty of any criminal negligence and has only been careless in giving approval to the kidney transplant.

The three-member committee had been appointed by the state government to check on the verificati­on process followed by the hospital

KIDNEY TRANSPLANT SCAM

committee that gave permission for the kidney transplant. Following a complaint, the Powai police had stopped the transplant and later inquiries revealed that the documents produced by the donor and the recipient had been forged.

The committee had first inquired into the roles of the five doctors from the hospital who had given permission and had found them to be guilty. As a result, these doctors were arrested by the Powai police for their role and were later released on bail, sources said.

The committee later inquired into the role of the government representa­tive, Dr BK Kadam, who was also part of the authorisat­ion committee. Highly-placed sources revealed that they have not found Dr Kadam guilty of any criminal activity, only careless in scrutinisi­ng the documents. “He was shown the documents only five minutes before the approval was given for the transplant and hence, he cannot be held responsibl­e for the mistake that occurred in giving permission for the transplant,” said a senior government official. However, the administra­tion has already taken action and has transferre­d Dr Kadam out of Mumbai and a department­al inquiry is also going to be held against him, sources said.

When queried on this issue, Dr Gauri Rathod, assistant director of health services, and who is also on the inquiry committee said that they are still in the process of finalising the report. ”Once the report is finalised we will submit this to the administra­tion for further action,” she added.

Sources said that it is surprising that the authorisat­ion committee did not bother to check the Xerox copies of the documents submitted by the donor and the recipient against the originals and took them at face value. “It is standard practice that the copies have to be verified against the original papers and only when they match, the permission is given for a transplant,” the official said.

Senior officials revealed that the state health services are also inquiring into the permission given by the authorisat­ion committee into two other cases. “Both these cases are from Gujarat and while one is the case of a brother to sister kidney donation, the other one is a sister to sister donation,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India