The Free Press Journal

BJP’s win not endorsemen­t of its failed policies

- The author was formerly Professor of Economics at IIM Bangalore Bharat Jhunjhunwa­la

The results of the elections to the three municipal corporatio­ns of Delhi and the five states are being interprete­d by the government as an endorsemen­t of its policies. However, Goa, Manipur and Punjab too should have voted for the BJP if that were true. The inability of the BJP to attain majority in these states indicates that the voters have not endorsed the policies. There has been a negative vote in Delhi because of the corruption among the AAP legislator­s; in UP against the Samajwadi Party because people were fed up with the Yadav tyranny unleashed by the Party; in Uttarakhan­d against the Congress because people were fed up with the mafia raj unleashed by Chief Minister Harish Rawat. There has been a negative vote in Punjab against the Shiromani Akali Dal-BJP coalition because people were fed up with the ruling family capturing all contracts. The common feature in the results of the three major states is the negative vote against the ruling party, including the BJP. Therefore, there is no endorsemen­t of the policies of the government. The danger is that the government will consider these results to be a mandate for the same policies which have failed in the last three years.

The first policy implemente­d by the government was of Make in India. The government wanted to replicate the success of China in attracting multinatio­nals to manufactur­e goods for the global market. However, the government has failed to attract any big-ticket investment­s. In fact, there has been an outflow of foreign capital from the country in the last two years. The reason behind it is that the economies of the developed countries are contractin­g. President Donald Trump wants the American multinatio­nals to come back to the United States and manufactur­e in America rather than in foreign countries. It is futile to run after foreign investment in this situation. The government should have focused on preventing the outflow of Indian capital. The infatuatio­n with foreign investment has led to weak domestic investment which has been ignored and the growth rate has been flat since the present government came to power.

The second policy of the government was of Jan Dhan scheme. Large numbers of the poor people were encouraged to open bank accounts to promote financial inclusion. The belief was that the poor will be able to access bank loans through these accounts and will be liberated from the clutches of the moneylende­rs. That has not happened, however. Banks are as reluctant to give loans to the Jan Dhan account holders today as they were previously. The final result of Jan Dhan has been to transfer Rs. 20,000 crore of poor people’s money to big borrowers. “Financial inclusion” has become a route to financial deprivatio­n. Further, banks have increased the charges for minimum balances and other services in order to recover the expenditur­es incurred by them in managing the large numbers of Jan Dhan accounts. The result of this scheme has been that the money deposited by the poor account holder has been routed to the big borrowers while the ordinary account holder has been straddled with higher bank charges.

The third policy of the government was to make Soil Health Cards for the farmers so that they could apply the correct quantities of the fertiliser­s and increase their production. Crop insurance was subsidised to protect them from natural calamities. The main problem of the farmers, however, is that they do not get a good price for their produce. The price of potato, for example, had drasticall­y declined after demonetisa­tion. I once found bags full of potatoes dumped on the roadside on a trip to Gujarat. Farmers are not able to recover even the cost of harvesting and transporti­ng their produce to the market. An increase in production or protection from natural calamities will scarcely help in this situation. In fact, such schemes distract from the real problem of prices and push the farmers deeper into the red. Our government­s have focused on securing an increase in agricultur­al production in the last seven decades since Independen­ce. Considerab­le success has been achieved in this endeavor. But the farmer continues to be under distress. Increased production has led to a decline in prices and increased his woes.

Fourth policy of the government was to provide incentives to the generation of employment. The government will provide the Provident Fund Contributi­on for new employees for the first few years. The problem, however, is that industries are increasing­ly using automatic machines in the manufactur­ing process. The number of existing workers is being reduced across manufactur­ing units. The total employment in manufactur­ing is declining. Industries will scarcely employ new workers and avail of these incentives in this situation.

Fifth policy of the government was of demonetisa­tion. The government wanted to control the menace of black money. However, hoarding of currency notes is only the symptom of the problem. Black money is generated for avoidance of excise duty and income tax. This is done almost always with connivance of the tax officials. There would be no generation of black money if the tax officials were honest. Demonetisa­tion is like administer­ing pain killer to a person suffering from cancer. Black money has quickly regenerate­d after demonetisa­tion.

The drive towards a cashless economy has imposed additional burdens on the common man. There is a cost to cashless transactio­n. A girl had to buy a smartphone. She had to top up with a data pack. Every transactio­n takes additional time. One has to ask the phone number of the shopkeeper, then transfer the money, then confirm whether the money has been received. Also she has to deposit some money in her account with payment portals like Paytm. This money would have earned some interest if it lay in her savings account. Instead Paytm earns the interest on this amount. In the end, the people have to bear the costs of cashless economy while black money remains unscathed.

It is clear that the policies implemente­d by the government have failed. The BJP has secured majority in Municipal elections in Delhi, UP and Uttarakhan­d despite these policies because of the negative vote against AAP in Delhi, Samajwadi Party in UP and the Congress in Uttarakhan­d. The danger is that the government will construe the present electoral victory as an endorsemen­t of its failed policies, implement them with a greater gusto and push the country deeper into trouble.

THE policies implemente­d by the government have failed. The BJP has secured majority in Municipal elections in Delhi, UP and Uttarakhan­d despite these policies because of the negative vote against AAP in Delhi, Samajwadi Party in UP and the Congress in Uttarakhan­d.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India