The Free Press Journal

SC reserves order on right to privacy

-

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on whether the right to privacy can be considered a fundamenta­l right under the Indian Constituti­on. The nine-judge Constituti­on Bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar reserved the order after hearing the matter in the last two weeks.

A nine-judge Constituti­on Bench on Wednesday concluded a fortnight-long hearing on whether the right to privacy is deemed a fundamenta­l right or not, but reserved the verdict without setting a date for delivering its verdict.

The said Bench was set up on July 18 and headed by Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar. The Bench heard arguments over three days each week by lawyers representi­ng the Centre, state government­s and individual petitioner­s who contended that the collection of personal data under the Aadhaar infringed on the right to privacy.

Is the right to privacy a fundamenta­l right guaranteed under the Indian Constituti­on was the limited question that had cropped up in the context of legal challenges to the Aadhaar number, which has now become the bedrock of government welfare programmes, tax administra­tion network and online financial transactio­ns.

Arguments to this effect were opened by senior advocate Gopal Subramaniu­m with a strong contention that privacy was not a shade of a fundamenta­l right but as one that was “inalienabl­e and quintessen­tial to the constructi­on of the Constituti­on.” He insisted that the concept of privacy was embedded in the right to liberty/dignity.

Shyam Divan, a senior advocate appearing for one of the petitions, sought to define “privacy” as one that includes bodily integrity, personal autonomy, protection from state surveillan­ce and freedom of dissent/movement/though. Starting its arguments on July 26, the Centre for the first time conceded that privacy is certainly a fundamenta­l right under the Constituti­on, but with a caveat that it is neither absolute nor could it be extended to “every aspect” of privacy.

Attorney general K.K. Venugopal submitted that privacy was at best a “subspecies of liberty and every aspect could not qualify as being fundamenta­l in nature.”

Following this, four state government­s -- Karnataka, Punjab, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh -- and the Union Territory of Puducherry backed the constituti­onality of the right to privacy. The states of Haryana and Kerala also joined the proceeding­s.

Once the privacy question is settled by the Constituti­on Bench, the remaining issues related to Aadhaar will be heard by a smaller Bench of the Supreme Court

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India