The Free Press Journal

Privacy is your fundamenta­l right

LANDMARK RULING Supreme Court bench puts an end to debate on issue UNDER SCANNER A host of digital & other initiates of the NDA government

- AGENCIES

Individual privacy is a guaranteed fundamenta­l right, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, a landmark verdict that could now test the validity of Aadhaar, the controvers­ial biometric identifica­tion project the government has been pushing but critics have opposed as intrusive.

Issuing a unanimous ruling, the nine-judge Bench said right to privacy was at par with right to life and liberty, and that the verdict will protect citizens’ personal freedom from intrusions by the state.

The Aadhaar law will now be tested against the right to privacy judgment, lawyers in the case said. The judgment also has a bearing on broader civil rights as well as a law criminalis­ing homosexual­ity. A ban imposed on the consumptio­n of beef in many states and alcohol in some could also come up for review.

“This right to privacy is protected under Article 21 and it is intrinsic to the Constituti­on,” said Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar, reading out the verdict for the ninejudge Bench. Article 21 guarantees the right to life and liberty as inviolable fundamenta­l rights.

The central government has been pushing for the wide use of Aadhaar, saying it is necessary to plug leakages in its subsidy schemes and to ensure benefits reach those targeted. This led to multiple petitions in court challengin­g Aadhaar on the question of privacy.

In upholding privacy as a fundamenta­l right, the top court overruled all earlier judgements that had said the right to privacy was not part of the Constituti­on.

In a quick reaction, the Opposition Congress, which had launched Aadhaar when it was in power, welcomed the verdict. “Path-breaking and seminal judgment. A great victory for liberty and freedom,” party spokespers­on Randeep Singh Surjewala tweeted.

But Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the BJP-led government at the Centre was always in favour of the right to privacy but with limitation­s.

Thursday’s verdict comes two days after the court in a landmark judgment struck down the Islamic divorce practice of instant triple talaq as unconstitu­tional.

Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Thursday rejected suggestion­s that the Supreme Court verdict on privacy was a setback and said the Modi government has viewed the right to privacy as a fundamenta­l right.

Addressing a press conference in the Capital after the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is a fundamenta­l right and an integral part of the right to life and liberty, Prasad said Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had articulate­d the government's view on the right to privacy while moving the Aadhaar bill for passage in Parliament in 2016. He attacked the Congress for accusing the government of curbing individual rights and said the opposition party had not enacted any legislatio­n regarding getting informatio­n under the Aadhaar framework.

“The government clearly saw the right of privacy as a fundamenta­l right,” Prasad said. Asked if it was a setback, Prasad said “Not the least”. “Whether it was Arun Jaitley's observatio­n or Attorney General’s arguments, both have been upheld by the court,” he said.

“The government welcomes the view of the Supreme Court, which is consistent with all the necessary safeguards that the government has been ensuring in its legislativ­e proposals which had been approved by Parliament,” Prasad said. He said Jaitley while moving the Aadhaar Bill had clearly stated “Is privacy a fundamenta­l right or not? The present Bill presuppose­s and is based on the premise and that it is too late in date to contend that privacy is not a fundamenta­l right”.

“So, I do accept that probably privacy is a fundamenta­l right. Now, where do you fit privacy as a fundamenta­l right? It is contended and broadly it is now accepted that privacy is a part of the individual liberty. So when Article 21 says, no person shall be deprived of his Right to Life and Liberty without procedure establishe­d by law, then let us assume that privacy is a part of liberty and no person shall be deprived of his privacy without procedure as establishe­d by law,” Prasad said quoting Jaitley.

He said the right to privacy was not an absolute right and was subject to reasonable restrictio­ns as applicable to the right to liberty, freedom and free speech.

The Minister said the essence of the apex court judgment is a “wider affirmatio­n” of the remarks made by Jaitley. Prasad, who is also IT and Communicat­ions Minister, said the government was keen on robust data protection laws and has appointed an expert committee to suggest a draft Data Protection Bill and to identify key data protection issues. “Robust data protection regime is needed to balance individual interests and state interests,” he said. Attacking the Congress, Prasad said the previous UPA government was seeking data under Aadhaar without formulatin­g a law and the National Democratic Alliance government had brought the legislatio­n after coming to power. Prasad said the government cannot give permission for release of data except in compelling circumstan­ces for which there is a strict laid down procedure. “The Congress has been attacking us from morning. The Left has also joined it. What has been the Congress record in protection of individual liberty,” Prasad asked.

He said individual liberty and media freedom had been severely curtailed during the internal Emergency imposed by the Congress in 1975. Prasad also referred to Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi's remarks that the apex court decision marks a major blow to fascist forces and said the Congress leader does not do his homework properly. He said about 30 crore Jan Dhan accounts have been opened which have been linked to Aadhaar and also mobile numbers. Asked about the impact of the judgment on section 377 of IPC, which criminalis­es gay sex, Prasad said he will speak on the issue in due course.

The government welcomes the view of the Supreme Court, which is consistent with all the necessary safeguards that the government has been ensuring — Ravi Shankar Prasad, Law Minister

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India