The Free Press Journal

ABYSMAL STANDARDS IN PESTICIDE USE

- Bhavdeep Kang The author is a senior journalist with 35 years of experience in working with major newspapers and magazines. She is now an independen­t writer and author

The devastatin­g impact of agricultur­al pesticides on farmers, consumers and even unborn children, is being felt across the country. The Yavatmal mass poisoning, which has so far claimed the lives of 40 farmers, recalls the Kasargode tragedy in Kerala, where exposure of pregnant women to the highly toxic pesticide, Endosulfan, led to congenital deformitie­s in their infants. It also recalls the 'cancer express' of Punjab, which carries victims of carcinogen­ic agro-chemicals to neighbouri­ng Rajasthan for treatment.

Pesticide use in India, per hectare of agricultur­al land, is lower than than of more developed nations like China, Japan and the United Kingdom. However, safety standards are abysmal, resulting in massive exposure of agricultur­al labourers and farmers to pesticides. In Kasargode, the victims just happened to live near the government-run cashew plantation­s which were sprayed by helicopter­s with Endosulfan. It contaminat­ed their water and food sources, leading to an epidemic of abnormalit­ies.

From the consumer perspectiv­e, use of pesticides on food crops has spawned an entire range of products, all claiming to wash fruits and vegetables free of pesticides. The good housewife dunks her groceries in the 'ozone purifier' or 'veg wash', before serving it up to her family. Few consumers stop to ask why items meant for eating are coated in poison in the first place.

The Rs 22,000 crore pesticide industry in India operates behind the benign tag of 'crop protection'. The industry stance is that it alone stands between India and mass starvation. Buying this argument, the central government permits the manufactur­e and sale of 51 pesticides so toxic that they are banned everywhere in the world except India. Even in the case of Endosulfan, the Indian government fought tooth and nail against a ban in internatio­nal forums. The Supreme Court had to step in and institute the ban in 2014.

Pesticides residues are found in the human body, years after ingestion. Minimum residue levels (MRLs) have been prescribed for foods, but testing is rare. Many pesticides used in India are persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which linger for decades after their use has been discontinu­ed. DDT in mothers' milk is a common phenomenon, more than three decades after it was banned in agricultur­e. The long-term impact and the synergies these pesticides develop with each other once they are ingested, have yet to be fully studied. But the evidence increasing­ly points to a link between cancer and pesticide usage.

Is there an alternativ­e to these highly toxic pesticides? Yes, there is. After all, before the green revolution, Indian agricultur­e relied solely on bio-pesticides. In the last couple of decades, Andhra and Telengana have shown the way for the rest of the country by adopting non-pesticidal agricultur­al practices (NPM), which has curtailed use of pesticides without affecting crop yields.

The NPM programme was launched because the high cost of pesticides was making agricultur­e non-viable for small farmers. Some farmers said 'crop protection' chemicals accounted for one-third of the total input cost. NPM has not only brought down the consumptio­n of pesticides statewide as compared to 2010 levels, but has improved the financial and physical health of farmers who are part of the programme.

Such farmers are also encouraged to adopt sustainabl­e farming practices like water conservati­on, seed saving, mixed and inter-cropping in order to maximize yields and earnings without resorting to expensive agro-chemicals and hybrid, water-guzzling seeds. This reduces the cost of irrigation. Overall, they spend half as much as convention­al farmers.

Bio-pesticides, along with agricultur­al practices like mixed cropping, crop rotation, summer ploughing, etc, have been proved to be effective in pest management. In India, success stories include control of whitefly infestatio­ns with neem, sugarcane borers with the tiny wasps known as Trichogram­ma and bollworms with the bacterium Bacillus thuringien­sis, better known as “Bt”. Biopestici­des target insects, weeds and plant diseases with far greater specificit­y than their chemical counterpar­ts. Sadly, bio-pesticides have a marginal presence in the total pesticide market in India, perhaps 3 per cent and within this, neem accounts for 85 per cent.

The maximum use of pesticides is on cotton crops, which account for nearly half the total demand. Cashew is another crop that is relentless­ly sprayed. Another downside to pesticide usage is that over time, pests develop immunity to agrochemic­als. Bt cotton was introduced because the bollworm, the major cotton pest, had developed immunity to a whole range of pesticides, including endosulfan. Now, it has developed immunity to Bt as well! Farmers are caught in a vicious cycle, constantly searching for new and even deadlier toxins to get rid of pests.

The trouble is that farmers have been encouraged by the purveyors of pesticides to develop a “pesticide first” mindset. They rely on pesticides as the first option, when it should be their last – and consumers are literally at the receiving end.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India