The Free Press Journal

Why has doctor-patient trust eroded?

NOW, the private sector was accorded a bigger role. What should have been provided by the government was now taken over mainly by the corporate sector for which profit has been the only motive without any considerat­ion for the marginalis­ed sections.

- Arun Mitra

Doctor-patient relationsh­ip is a pious one, based on trust and faith. That is why a patient feels better going to a certain doctor; but the same medicines given by another doctor may not lead to the same improvemen­t. In routine cases, the patients wait for long without complainin­g so that they can meet the doctor they trust. This relationsh­ip is important because it is a question of one's own body or of kith and kin with whom he is emotionall­y attached. Any untoward happening during the course of treatment is not acceptable. But, if the existing relationsh­ip has been on strong bonds, there is a possibilit­y of rapprochem­ent. It is not a small thing that even today, patients treat a doctor next to the god. That is a result of faith bestowed upon by a patient on a doctor, who is seen not only as a healer of one's medical sufferings but also a counselor on personal and family matters. The godly image of the doctor is developed in the eyes of the patient because of the conviction that the doctor would always be ethical and his or her conduct would be based on moral principles.

But this relationsh­ip has been weakened in the last few years. There is a lot of talk about many doctors being unethical. There is a feeling in the people's mind that doctors fleece the patients either by overchargi­ng or over-medication. This needs to be examined in broader perspectiv­e.

Any profession is a reflection of contempora­ry socio-economic setup. There has been a time when the doctor in our region – a vaid, would not charge anything from the patient and be content with whatever was given to him in offering – the dakshina. The same was true for the teacher – the guru. Those were the times of limited knowledge and limited resources. Education was the right of a few selected from the socalled upper castes. Health care was comparativ­ely more liberally available to the ordinary people, even though the vast majority of population was left to the mercy of the faith healers, particular­ly the poor and the marginalis­ed sections.

With changes in the system and the entry of modern scientific medicine in the health scenario, the situation has started changing. There was extensive research and new drugs came up, which needed marketing. Thus, medicine started becoming a business. There was a time when the young students wanted to be doctors because they thought that it is a noble profession and they can serve the society by ending the sufferings of people in addition to a financiall­y secure life and social status as a doctor. It was an overt feeling.

Change occurred rapidly when the socio economic relations in our country were redefined. There was a paradigm shift in 1980s. The government started shedding its responsibi­lity from health care and decided to change its role from a provider to facilitato­r. Even though, the private sector has been the major healthcare provider earlier too, its role was limited to only the basic or secondary level healthcare. Advanced tertiary healthcare was the government’s domain. Now, the private sector was accorded a bigger role. What should have been provided by the government was now taken over mainly by the corporate sector for which profit has been the only motive without any considerat­ion for the marginalis­ed sections.

This is the time when in the competitiv­e market healthcare profession­als too got affected. The cuts and commission­s began from the diagnostic­s stage and then even in the referrals. Pharmaceut­ical sector started bribing the doctors to prescribe their products. This weakened the trust of the patients. Even though a small number of doctors were not involved in such deals, the image of profession as a whole got affected.

Medicine is a distinct profession where we serve the sick and infirm. It has a bigger responsibi­lity and should be powerful enough to withstand the impact of market pressure. Whereas doctors owe responsibi­lity to bring back the doctor patient relationsh­ip on strong footing, it is also for the society to see that aspiration­s of doctors are fulfilled, and all doctors are not viewed in the same light.

The writer is senior Vice President – Indian Doctors for Peace and Developmen­t, Former Chairman – Ethical Committee, Punjab Medical Council and Member – Core Committee ADEH (Alliance of Doctors on Ethical Healthcare).

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India