The Free Press Journal

Denial of informatio­n for lack of Aadhaar breach of RTI Act: CIC

- AGENCIES

Denial of informatio­n for the lack of Aadhaar card is a serious breach of right guaranteed under the RTI Act and amounts to harassment of the applicant, the Central Informatio­n Commission has held.

The Commission has imposed maximum penalty under the act on the then RTI handling officer of the Housing & Urban Developmen­t Corporatio­n (HUDCO) for not providing informatio­n on gifts purchased by it and expenses incurred by its CMDs on the grounds that identifica­tion documents were not provided by the applicant, reports PTI.

The case pertains to Vishwas Bhamburkar who had sought details of amounts “spent from the coffers” of HUDCO on gifts for years 2013 to 2016, renovation of official residence of its Chairman and Managing Director in ASIAD village, electricit­y bills of the official residence, and remunerati­ons paid to the CMDs among others.

CPIO D K Gupta wrote a letter on August 5, 2016 demanding the proof of identity and proof of address by producing Aadhar card, voter ID Card or passport as proof of citizenshi­p from Bhamburkar, Informatio­n Commission­er Sridhar Acharyulu noted.

“He did not say anything about giving informatio­n sought. No informatio­n was given within 30 days. The applicant filed this complaint. He has also filed first appeal, asking for informatio­n without insisting on the proofs,” he said.

Acharyulu noted that in his response Gupta said, because some others filed repetitive RTIs he wanted to verify bona fides of this applicant.

“This contention is not legal and hence not acceptable. He also failed to justify the denial of informatio­n, as he could not site any clause of exception under Section 8 or 9. From his submission­s it is clear that the informatio­n sought did not attract any exception prescribed under the RTI Act,” he said.

Not only in 30 days, but even after that the informatio­n was not given until the CIC ordered, thus, deemed refusal of RTI applicatio­n was proved in this case and that should attract the penal proceeding­s, Acharyulu said.

“The CPIO can deny informatio­n only under Section 8 and 9. He cannot invent new grounds for denial like lack of Aadhaar Card, Voter Id Card, Passport etc. This Section was violated by Dr D K Gupta as he did not give any informatio­n in 30 days and beyond also,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India