The Free Press Journal

AAP MLAS’ DISQUALIFI­CATION: DELHI HC RESTRAINS EC FROM ANNOUNCING BY-POLLS

- AGENCIES

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday restrained the Election Commission from announcing bypolls till Monday to 20 Delhi Assembly seats in the wake of the disqualifi­cation of 20 AAP MLAs for holding office of profit as Parliament­ary Secretarie­s.

“Don’t take precipitat­ive steps that will aggravate the situation,” Justice Vibhu Bakhru said, adding the court will hear the grievances of these since-disqualifi­ed 20 AAP MLAs in detail on January 29, reports IANS.

The court, however, refused to stay the impugned notificati­on on the disqualifi­cation and listed the matter for hearing on Monday (January 29).

It also asked the Election Commission, Centre, Delhi government and complainan­t-lawyer Prashant Patel to file their responses to the AAP MLAs’ challenge to the notificati­on.

The court rejected the Election Commission’s submission that the case must be heard by a Division Bench instead of a single Judge to save time.

Eight AAP MLAs on Tuesday moved the High Court to challenge the disqualify­ing notificati­on.

The counsel for the Aam Aadmi Party MLAs told the court that the notificati­on is a “gross violation of natural justice because the Election Commission decided the matter in undue haste and without affording and giving any opportunit­y of fair hearing to the petitioner­s”.

They pleaded that the action was contrary to Article 14 of the Constituti­on of India, ultra vires, void ab initio, and an attack on the basic fabric of democracy.

The ruling party’s disqualifi­ed legislator­s said that the EC action is bad in the eyes of law and completely affected by the vice of arbitrarin­ess and its failure to adhere to the enshrined principle of rule of natural justice.

“The failure to give an opportunit­y of hearing has gravely prejudiced the petitioner­s and their civil rights have been seriously affected,” the plea said.

Sunil Arora, appointed the Election Commission­er after Syed Nasim Ahmad Zaidi’s retirement, never had any occasion to deal with the matter or to understand the facts of the case, the petitioner­s told the court.

The complainan­t, Prashant Patel, failed to produce any prima facie material on record to show that any profit was derived or pecuniary advantage taken by them, they contended.

Their counsel said there was nothing on record to show that any of the ingredient­s was made out against the AAP MLAs for holding an office of profit.

Following an Election Commission recommenda­tion to President Ram Nath Kovind, the Law and Justice Ministry on Saturday issued a notificati­on that the President had okayed the disqualifi­cation of the 20 MLAs.

The disqualifi­ed MLAs are Alka Lamba, Adarsh Shastri, Sanjeev Jha, Rajesh Gupta, Kailash Gahlot, Vijendra Garg, Praveen Kumar, Sharad Kumar, Madan Lal Khufiya, Shiv Charan Goyal, Sarita Singh, Naresh Yadav, Rajesh Rishi, Anil Kumar, Som Dutt, Avtar Singh, Sukhvir Singh Dala, Manoj Kumar, Nitin Tyagi, and Jarnail Singh.

Eight of them have requested the court to quash the EC’s opinion dated January 19 and an official gazette notificati­on dated January 20 published on January 21.

The petitioner­s’ counsel said that the Ministry of Law and Justice issued the notificati­on on the opinion rendered by the Election Commission, which is “unconstitu­tional”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India