The Free Press Journal

Kamala Mills operated without MPCB consent

- AKASH SAKARIA

In response to a query filed under Right to Informatio­n (RTI) filed by a non-government­al organisati­on (NGO) Watchdog Foundation, in the Kamala Mills fire case, the Maharashtr­a Pollution Control Board (MPCB) have stated, no permission was obtained from them to operate in the premises.

“We have received informatio­n under RTI Act, from MPCB which has stated the officials had not issued Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate to Kamala Mills. This fact has been entirely omitted in the report probing the fire incident at Kamala Mills, given by the Municipal Commission­er Ajoy Mehta,” said Godfrey Pimenta, trustee of Watchdog Foundation.

An official from MPCB, who did not wished to be named, confirmed there was no permission granted from the authoritie­s. Moreover, this permission is needed for any IT (Informatio­n Technology) hub to acquire the said permission. It needs to be noted, the Kamala Mills management had acquired NOCs and licences previously for constructi­ng an IT hub and had shown the original plans of open terrace for eating area. The entire plans and design were totally changed for starting pubs and restaurant­s.

Under the provisions of Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act,. 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1981, an entreprene­ur running or establishi­ng any industry and dischargin­g effluent and emitting pollutants into any water resources or on land/air and polluting thereby the environmen­tal water/air is required to obtain two consents— consent to establish and consent to operate.

“Consent to Establish is to be obtained prior to establishi­ng any industry or process while Consent to Operate is required once the industry or process plant is establishe­d along the required pollution control systems. This consent is given for a particular period, which needs to be renewed regularly,” stated Pimenta.

Since Kamala Mill was shown as an IT Park it was obligatory to obtain Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate to Kamala Mills.

Since these approvals were not obtained, MPCB should have suo moto launched prosecutio­n against the owners of Kamala Mills under Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act,. 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1981 and Environmen­t (Protection) Act, 1986.

“We demand an enquiry into this serious lapse on the part of MPCB, BMC and Mumbai Fire Brigade who granted permission­s to them to operate without proper approval,” Nicholas Almeida, another trustee of Watchdog Foundation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India