Rai has been complete failure in implementing Lodha reforms: Chaudhary

The BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary on Friday launched a scathing attack on Committee of Administrators (COA) chief Vinod Rai, terming him a “complete failure” in the implementation of the Supreme Court-mandated Lodha Committee reforms.

The BCCI office-bearers, especially Choudhary and treasurer Aniruddh Chaudhry, have been sidelined by the COA, which even sought their termination from the Supreme Court.

Choudhary, who has not attacked on Rai till date, was no-holds-barred in his criticism today after the former CAG described BCCI office-bearers as obstructionists with vested interests in recent interactions with the media. “The unfortunate fact that I conclude is that after one and half years, Rai has realised apart from writing e-mails, he has not been able to do anything else. He was mandated to implement the reforms and he has been a complete failure,” the former Additional Director General of Police (Jharkhand) said in an interview. “Rai is trying to run down the office-bearers because he has failed to engage them in a positive manner despite having spent one and half years which was mostly spent in making appointments in opaque processes, which I brought to everyone’s notice,” he fired another salvo referring to appointment of Anti Corruption Unit (ACU) Chief Ajit Singh and GM (marketing) Priya Gupta.

While Singh joined the BCCI, Gupta did not take up the offer. The former CAG has recently expressed his frustration about the long time taken by the Supreme Court to pass the final order on the constitutional reform. “How can anyone talk about the Supreme Court in such a manner? Least of all, someone who has spent over four decades in the government,” Choudhary said.

So does he think that recent comments by Rai about the delay amount to Contempt of Court, Choudhary replied: “I can’t take a view on that as I am not court. Neither am I Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, Max Planc or Albert Einstein all rolled into one like some are.”

The acting secretary also wondered how from being termed “co-operative” by the COA in their fourth Status report, he became an “obstructionist” by the seventh report.