The Free Press Journal

CBI’s IO defends recorded statements

- AYESHA SHAIKH /

In the Sohrabuddi­n Encounter Case on Wednesday, the special Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) court has started examining the 34 Investigat­ing Officers. On the second day of his deposition, A D More, the Investigat­ing Officer of CBI said he had recorded statements of eight witnesses of which four had turned hostile, which included Apte family members, who had travelled in the luxury bus from which allegedly Sohrabuddi­n Shaikh and his wife Kauser Bi were abducted. More, who had recorded statements of the Apte family, M N Rathore, Laxmi Narayanan, Chandresh Patel and Dr.Prakash Bandivdeka­r, defended his claim, he had recorded only that which the witnesses had narrated and kept blaming his Chief Investigat­ing Officer, Amitabh Thakur. The special CBI Judge, S J Sharma told him, “You are an Investigat­ing officer you cannot blame your chief.”

In the cross-examinatio­n of More, which was conducted by Advocate Hitesh Shah and Advocate Wahab Khan, both tried to shed light in those areas where More had not investigat­ed. While questionin­g him Shah told him, “You recorded the statements of Apte family under Section 164 Cr.Pc by falsifying that they had to notarise some documents.” More claimed he had noted verbatim as was told to him. “It is not true, I recorded only that which the witness had narrated.” When Advocate Wahab Khan started cross-examining him he alleged More had created a bogus story and had met with witness Dr Prakash Bandivdeka­r to convince him to give statements under Section 164 Cr.Pc. Khan also questioned him about Bandivdeka­r being convicted in a murder case and his connection with criminals belonging to gangs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India