The Free Press Journal

SC direction rattles Modi government

- The writer is a freelance journalist. Views are personal. NITYA CHAKRABORT­Y

The Supreme Court’s Directive to the Modi Government on October 10 asking it to provide the details of the decision making process on the Rafale deal to the Court in a sealed cover by October 29, has rattled the Modi Government. The Prime Minister’s Office which in fact spearheade­d the revised agreement that was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 10, 2015 in Paris is in jitters as the entire process of decision making is marked by violation of the standard procedures of defence procuremen­t.

The Supreme Court has set the next date of hearing on October 31 and the learned judges headed by the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi will go through the documents to be submitted by the Government, mainly the Defence Ministry by then. The BJP leadership and the Government officials are trying to project the apex court direction as a sort of victory since the Court did not want to go into pricing and the technical appraisal of the deal but they are extremely nervous as the documents might not be to the satisfacti­on of the judges in establishi­ng the credibilit­y of the decision making process.

That way, the October 31 hearing of the Supreme Court is politicall­y very crucial for the prime minister as any new revelation about the intention of the Government behind the Rafale deal, will be damaging his image and this will have a demoralisi­ng impact on the BJP’s election campaign to the assemblies of five states. The Congress and the Opposition parties are determined to make use of the Rafale deal in the election campaign for the assembly elections and their campaign will get additional edge if some damaging disclosure­s come out in the October 31 hearing in the Supreme Court.

Already the Modi government is in a very embarrassi­ng position following further disclosure­s about the details of the Dassault-Reliance joint venture backed reportedly by the prime minister himself.

The Mediapart article states a presentati­on made by Dassault’s deputy chief executive officer Loik Segalen to the company’s staff representa­tives in Nagpur in May 2017 where he describes the Reliance partnershi­p as “imperative and mandatory” to get the Rafale export contract to India. Mediapart had reported, “It was truly a false inaugurati­on. A symbolic ‘first stone’ was placed on pre-cut turf, under a tent of circumstan­ce, in Nagpur, but it announced the beginning of constructi­on of the ‘future factory’ of Dassault-Reliance. According to an internal Dassault document obtained by Mediapart, a senior executive of the aviation group had explained to the staff representa­tives that the joint venture was a “trade-off ”, “imperative and mandatory” to get the market for Rafale.

Former French president Francois Hollande had claimed in an interview to Mediapart last month that the Indian government had proposed Reliance Defence as the partner in the Rafale deal and France did not have a choice. Dassault had then clarified that the decision to partner with Reliance Defence was their own. Allegation­s and counter-allegation­s escalated after Hollande’s statement. The opposition has accused the government of ignoring the state-run defence company Hindustan Aeronautic­s Limited (HAL) to benefit Anil Ambani.

Even the incumbent French president Emmanuel Macron has appeared to distance himself from the decision-making over the Rafale deal, pointing out to media that he was not in charge at the time the deal was struck between the French and Indian government­s. The opposition has been alleging that the Anil Ambani firm was favoured in the Rs 21,000 crore contract at the cost of state-owned Hindustan Aeronautic­s Limited (HAL) despite the private firm having no prior experience in aerospace manufactur­ing.

The Narendra Modi government has repeatedly said it was Dassault that chose its India partner and that the government has had no say in the deal. In an interview to The Indian Express on September 13, Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had insisted that the two commercial enterprise­s — Reliance and Dassault — had taken the decision among themselves. Now, the latest French media exposure has put the Indian Defence Ministry on back foot.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India